GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Guys with cam questions.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
02Reaper's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 780
Likes: 1
From: Swainsboro GA
Default Guys with cam questions.....

Take a look at this thread.

http://www.hardcorels1.com/vbulletin...ted=1#post2128
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Say no to Off The Shelf (OTS) cams.
More customs.

Last edited by Sport Side; Jan 9, 2006 at 07:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 07:48 PM
  #3  
AintNoHo's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

I think it's odd that he thinks the cam is so great. 17hp and 4ft/lb is close to a margin of error for dyno runs. The real difference as he himself said is traction. If you can't get traction, times can be all over the board.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #4  
Kano's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

congrats, nice results all over


where they count
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #5  
02Reaper's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 780
Likes: 1
From: Swainsboro GA
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
I think it's odd that he thinks the cam is so great. 17hp and 4ft/lb is close to a margin of error for dyno runs. The real difference as he himself said is traction. If you can't get traction, times can be all over the board.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #6  
Restricted User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Working in the shop 24/7
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
I think it's odd that he thinks the cam is so great. 17hp and 4ft/lb is close to a margin of error for dyno runs. The real difference as he himself said is traction. If you can't get traction, times can be all over the board.
Traction issues were not resolved during either test session. They are being worked on right now. Once resolved, then there will be an even bigger delta in ET from the second test to the next one...

Besides... the extra MPH surely shows the cam helped the truck accelerate...

Ed
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #7  
Tractionless's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Default

The specs on that cam would be....

Last edited by Tractionless; Jan 10, 2006 at 03:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
joshluther's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: Casino, CT.
Default

I'm curious what the mph was its not listed.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #9  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

From what I understand, it is a 220/224 profile with a 111* seperation.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #10  
02Reaper's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 780
Likes: 1
From: Swainsboro GA
Default

Originally Posted by joshluther
I'm curious what the mph was its not listed.
The mph thing for the quarter mile wasnt working on that side of the track that night.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.