Finally went to the dyno....

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 14, 2005 | 03:24 PM

#11

ACDenali

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 660

Likes: 0

From: Lexington, Ky

I wish there was an AWD dyno around here somewhere.

Jan 23, 2005 | 06:09 PM

#12

CAMMIN03'

Thread Starter

Banned

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 1,581

Likes: 1

From: Athens, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by 02Reaper

just take it back after the cam swap and let us know what it puts down then. Those numbers sound pretty good to me. Just remember that all of those people with the 4.8's that have comparable horsepower are probably not so comparable when the torque comes into play. Yes the vho's are putting down about the same power that you are, even with your mods, but you have to remember that they have more displacement and better flowing heads on top of that (this is not saying that a 4.8, 5.3, 5.7, or 6.0 with the same mods will put out close to the same hp/tq, they probably wont unless one is a freak).

Went back to the dyno and put
numbers below in sig down.....

284.8rwhp and 299.7rwtq (with towhaul on... some people say that got 10+ with it off)

Jan 23, 2005 | 06:23 PM

#13

XFACTOR

TECH Junkie

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 3,350

Likes: 0

From: Houston, TX

I think those #'s with the mods you have are pretty good myself. I do agree you can probably get a little more out of the tune but for whats done in terms of mods thats good.

Jan 23, 2005 | 06:24 PM

#14

CAMMIN03'

Thread Starter

Banned

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 1,581

Likes: 1

From: Athens, GA

I was pretty happy with it... I jsut wish I coulda got that extra .3 ftlbs so I can have one 300 on my sheet....lol

Jan 23, 2005 | 06:25 PM

#15

Rob 94Hawk 319

11 Second Club

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 266

Likes: 0

From: San Diego

I guess mine is pretty decent with 270 rwhp and 283 rwtq on 20's, and AC on?

Volant, JBA shorties, custom exhaust, E-Fans.

Jan 23, 2005 | 06:29 PM

#16

CAMMIN03'

Thread Starter

Banned

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 1,581

Likes: 1

From: Athens, GA

I was at 254.9 before the cam..... I thought that was kinda low... and then after the cam it went to 284.8 so .... who knows... It has alot to do with how cool your engine is at the time of the pull

Jan 23, 2005 | 06:30 PM

#17

CAMMIN03'

Thread Starter

Banned

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 1,581

Likes: 1

From: Athens, GA

We did 2 pulls and it showed 273.8 and then let it sit for 5-10mins and then pulled 284.8 so

Jan 23, 2005 | 07:20 PM

#18

02Reaper

TECH Resident

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 780

Likes: 1

From: Swainsboro GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAMMIN03'

I was at 254.9 before the cam..... I thought that was kinda low... and then after the cam it went to 284.8 so .... who knows... It has alot to do with how cool your engine is at the time of the pull

Everytime Ive been to the dyno, the warmer the vehicle was, the more power it put down. This is with no cool off sessions and with three pulls.

Jan 23, 2005 | 09:00 PM

#19

Weedo

TECH Regular

iTrader: (1)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 427

Likes: 0

From: Chandler Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAMMIN03'

Went back to the dyno and put
numbers below in sig down.....

284.8rwhp and 299.7rwtq (with towhaul on... some people say that got 10+ with it off)

Pretty similar to what my '02 6.0 Denali put out with a Flowmaster cat-back:
280hp/310tq. Then again it's all-wheel drive which would lose more power at the wheels, but...