Fair head milling price?
#12
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Why 243's? With milling it's going to rise the compression ratio and for a boost motor you don't want the compression ratio to high.
IMO - 317's would be better, cheaper and flow just as well as the 243 head.
IMO - 317's would be better, cheaper and flow just as well as the 243 head.
#13
I was gonna have them milled to bring compression back to 9.5:1. Do you know what the compression is on them if I don't mill them?
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
What motor are you putting these on? The 243's have a small chamber and would bump your compression up as they sit. The 317's are the same head but with a 71cc combustion chamber, thus why they are preferred for boosted app's.
#16
compression with a stock LQ4 and 317's is 9.5:1. If you swap the smaller chambered 243 heads onto the stock LQ4 you're looking at roughly 10.4:1, and that's without milling them at all.
#17
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
With 9.5cr, you're DCR (dynamic compression ratio) will be 15-16cr (this is good).
Treat DCR as how fast does it rev when you blip the throttle. With a pd blower, it's going to feel really really snappy.
#20
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
With this combo and .030 milling, .051 headgaskets, your CR will be around 9.5:1.
You loose compression from the 5.3 to the 243 heads because the 243 has a larger combustion chamber.
The 5.3 head has the smallest combustion chamber of any stock ls type head.
You loose compression from the 5.3 to the 243 heads because the 243 has a larger combustion chamber.
The 5.3 head has the smallest combustion chamber of any stock ls type head.


