GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #11  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

I think 15%-20% is way off. The difference between Dynojet numbers and Mustang numbers (arguably the dynomometers with the biggest disparity) are typically only 5%-8%. So this would mean that Superflow dynos measure 10%-15% less than Mustang dynos, which I seriously doubt.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #12  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Take it from the Dyno Pro!

































J/K
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 09:31 PM
  #13  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 10:14 PM
  #14  
O3GMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Yeah, 15-20 sounded like too much, and Allen showed me a dyno of a stock truck which made 230, and I think people usually see close to 250 on a Dynojet (If I remember right) which would be about 8% difference. Although we all know different trucks dont make exactly the same power, so I dont really like comparing to some other truck's stock numbers.

And if it was 8% more, my Dynojet numbers would be 365/424, which I would still be happy with, especially considering the heat and humidity.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$A_Money$81
FORCED INDUCTION
24
Mar 27, 2023 10:25 AM
Go5.3tt06
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
25
Sep 4, 2016 10:25 AM
Lthompson
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Oct 2, 2015 12:45 AM
jscherbs
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 30, 2015 07:54 AM
norris_83
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
0
Sep 9, 2015 04:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.