dyno numbers are in, didn't quite make 500
Apr 18, 2004 | 03:55 PM
#14
TECH Veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Snake Eater
So with a turbo, is reverse split better? Or just split duration in general?
Awsome #s by the way.
Awsome #s by the way.
That's what I was wondering, maybe that reverse split or a single pattern is better to help in turbo spool-up. Perhaps that way there is no exhaust overlap/scavenging or something. The cams in my WRX are single patterns...for what it's worth...
Apr 18, 2004 | 09:02 PM
#17
Good info parish! I like the vids too 
I was waiting for the camera guy to get a shot of the glowing red passenger header. I still can't believe it melted the wheel well 
So you did add more timing below that 5000rpm mark and not just above... If you did add below, I would think that torque curve would really pick up. I know adding 5-6* timing in my truck with the boost feels like I added another 4psi.
I was waiting for the camera guy to get a shot of the glowing red passenger header. I still can't believe it melted the wheel well
Originally Posted by parish8
other really odd thing is on my 2 best runs(the pump gas and 100 octane) i basicly got the same hp and TQ from the bottom all the way up till about 5000rpm, above 5000rpm is the only time the extra boost and timing made more power, prety odd huh.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post