GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Cams and 6.0 lq9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
Silver-Dollar's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Default Cams and 6.0 lq9

I have been looking at cams for several years for my 5.3 and pretty much decided on the TSP 220R. However, I came across a good deal (to me) for a LQ9. Now, I begin a new quest.

I was thinking that a comparable cam for the added displacement would be a 224/224 on a 112lsa. I know I am still restricted by the intake. What would be a good cam for an LQ9 if I want a WOT shift point of 6200 pm? Please keep in mind, the mods in the signature are making their way onto the 6.0.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #2  
OnyxSilveradoSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

you can go bigger, if you get heads then you will really want bigger. I just got that cam and it is not tuned yet...but I got a deal on mine so it was worth it, but the SSS (which has the LQ9) guys are going bigger 237ish but with heads and headers.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 05:39 AM
  #3  
Silver-Dollar's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Default

No head work at this time. Just stock 243 and the replacement 918s.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
Silver-Dollar's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Default

I wonder if the TSP torquer V2 on a 112 will be to big.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #5  
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
From: Breaux Bridge, LA
Default

with that converter in your sig go with a 220/112
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 08:51 AM
  #6  
adam1803's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 1
From: Tyndall AFB / Panama City, FL
Default

i used a gt2-3 in my 6.0 with a 3200 stall and it was great, i would recommend it.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 09:04 AM
  #7  
Tootall's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 1
From: League City, Tx
Default

there's more options if you change your stall
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #8  
silent1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, Il
Default

Bigger cam and stall!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...=726581&page=1
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #9  
Silver-Dollar's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Default

Should I step up to the SST 3200 for the 224?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #10  
silent1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, Il
Default

A 3200 stall will better match future heads and cam setups but not necessary for a 224 cam. I ran a 232/237 cam in my 5.3 and a TT3000, it was enough. Go with the 3200 if you want the absolute max out of your cam or if you know you will take your truck much further than a cam w/ bolt ons. Again, a 3200 isn't "needed" for a 224.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.