GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

ACDelco 41-110 Iridium in 2000 Tahoe 5.3L

Old Dec 11, 2018 | 06:28 AM
  #1  
Ndionano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default ACDelco 41-110 Iridium in 2000 Tahoe 5.3L

I switched out the stock plugs during a tune up in June 2018 with AC Delco 41-110 Iridium plugs<!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->https://mechanicfaq.com/spark-plugs-for-5-3-silverado/ per the AC Delco book and Rock Auto lookup. Since the tune up, I've always felt the gas mileage has come down. I'm getting 14-15 MPG on the highway keeping it under 70 MPH, when I used to get around 17 MPG. I chalked it up to ethanol fuels.

I just read that AC Delco is no longer recommending this plug for 2000 - 2005 5.3L vortex engines. They are now recommending 41-962 Platinum plugs.

Does anyone have details on why they made the switch? I'm curious to know if the 41-962's are more efficient for this engine and if I should make the switch to the latest recommendation. The $50 cost will quickly be returned if I get 3 MPG back.

Is anyone else running the Delco 41-110 plugs in a 2000 to 2005 5.3L and noticing a drop in fuel mileage?

Thanks.

Last edited by Ndionano; Dec 15, 2018 at 08:09 AM. Reason: link removed
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2018 | 07:13 PM
  #2  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,592
Likes: 900
From: JunkYard
Default

From what I found they are cheaper alternative. See the attached PDF

I believe the original plugs where 41-985 Platinum with a .060 Gap. This was discontinued and replaced by the 41-110

41-110 is Iridium With Recommended .040 Gap
41-962 is Double Platinum With Recommended .040 Gap
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
41-110 to 41-962 Update.pdf (32.3 KB, 50 views)
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2018 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
swathdiver's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 393
Likes: 64
From: Treasure Coast of Florida
Default

I read a lot of posts about folks complaining about reduced mileage when using those 41-110s. This was even with folks that originally used the 41-985s pre-gapped to .040" too.

I lucked out and bought a brand new box of 41-985s so I have no experience with the newer ones!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91RS
GM Parts Classifieds
11
Feb 11, 2013 06:14 AM
boydcoz71
GM Parts Classifieds
0
Sep 23, 2012 07:02 PM
viciousknid
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
12
Nov 4, 2010 07:38 PM
1SlowHoe
GM Parts Classifieds
7
Sep 9, 2006 06:41 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.