Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ACDelco 41-110 Iridium in 2000 Tahoe 5.3L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2018, 06:28 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ndionano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ACDelco 41-110 Iridium in 2000 Tahoe 5.3L

I switched out the stock plugs during a tune up in June 2018 with AC Delco 41-110 Iridium plugs<!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->https://mechanicfaq.com/spark-plugs-for-5-3-silverado/ per the AC Delco book and Rock Auto lookup. Since the tune up, I've always felt the gas mileage has come down. I'm getting 14-15 MPG on the highway keeping it under 70 MPH, when I used to get around 17 MPG. I chalked it up to ethanol fuels.

I just read that AC Delco is no longer recommending this plug for 2000 - 2005 5.3L vortex engines. They are now recommending 41-962 Platinum plugs.

Does anyone have details on why they made the switch? I'm curious to know if the 41-962's are more efficient for this engine and if I should make the switch to the latest recommendation. The $50 cost will quickly be returned if I get 3 MPG back.

Is anyone else running the Delco 41-110 plugs in a 2000 to 2005 5.3L and noticing a drop in fuel mileage?

Thanks.

Last edited by Ndionano; 12-15-2018 at 08:09 AM. Reason: link removed
Old 12-11-2018, 07:13 PM
  #2  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,322
Received 758 Likes on 627 Posts
Default

From what I found they are cheaper alternative. See the attached PDF

I believe the original plugs where 41-985 Platinum with a .060 Gap. This was discontinued and replaced by the 41-110

41-110 is Iridium With Recommended .040 Gap
41-962 is Double Platinum With Recommended .040 Gap
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
41-110 to 41-962 Update.pdf (32.3 KB, 29 views)
Old 12-13-2018, 10:52 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
swathdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Treasure Coast of Florida
Posts: 378
Received 49 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I read a lot of posts about folks complaining about reduced mileage when using those 41-110s. This was even with folks that originally used the 41-985s pre-gapped to .040" too.

I lucked out and bought a brand new box of 41-985s so I have no experience with the newer ones!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boydcoz71
GM Parts Classifieds
0
09-23-2012 07:02 PM
viciousknid
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
12
11-04-2010 07:38 PM
1SlowHoe
GM Parts Classifieds
7
09-09-2006 06:41 PM



Quick Reply: ACDelco 41-110 Iridium in 2000 Tahoe 5.3L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.