View Poll Results: Which one would you prefer if the Tahoe was yours?
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll
862s vs 243s on an LQ4
#53
#54
this mfer using a rotary phone https://obsproject.com/download
Anyway heres a better quality version of the video
Last edited by dantheman1540; Jul 27, 2021 at 12:21 PM.
#56
#58
so what if i use a rotary? wanna fight?! 
okay, and so i did forget to factor in the extra 1000lb that fat porker has on driving expectations compared to mine. and does your trans have the weird early gearset in it?
my shift point math was based on the 5.61 - 3.04 - 1.67 - 1.00 - .73 models and was more like a DCT because it didn't account for any decel or clutch slip: simply (shift RPM / current gear) x next gear.
if that still works for you, then have at it.

okay, and so i did forget to factor in the extra 1000lb that fat porker has on driving expectations compared to mine. and does your trans have the weird early gearset in it?
my shift point math was based on the 5.61 - 3.04 - 1.67 - 1.00 - .73 models and was more like a DCT because it didn't account for any decel or clutch slip: simply (shift RPM / current gear) x next gear.
if that still works for you, then have at it.
#59
so what if i use a rotary? wanna fight?! 
okay, and so i did forget to factor in the extra 1000lb that fat porker has on driving expectations compared to mine. and does your trans have the weird early gearset in it?
my shift point math was based on the 5.61 - 3.04 - 1.67 - 1.00 - .73 models and was more like a DCT because it didn't account for any decel or clutch slip: simply (shift RPM / current gear) x next gear.
if that still works for you, then have at it.

okay, and so i did forget to factor in the extra 1000lb that fat porker has on driving expectations compared to mine. and does your trans have the weird early gearset in it?
my shift point math was based on the 5.61 - 3.04 - 1.67 - 1.00 - .73 models and was more like a DCT because it didn't account for any decel or clutch slip: simply (shift RPM / current gear) x next gear.
if that still works for you, then have at it.
Just trying to point out that if the 243s only made power over the 862s above 4k I think it would be a benefit due to the amount of time the truck sees above 4k in a spirited run. Obviously, during daily driving, I typically shift before 2,500 so they wouldn't help at all in 99% of driving scenarios unless I drop a gear of course.
#60
I used a rotary phone in my kitchen until my Lab puppy chewed up the cord in 1997. Went to Circuit City and bought my first cell phone and still have the same mobile number since 1997... It's an old folks thing.
We need to hear the engine sounds and them squealing tars along with HP Tuners...
No film schooling necessary boys
Love how the Tach goes red when you pass the gauges redline (not the limiter) 52MPH first gear when I had 3.42's
This was my very first data log when I didn't know ****... still don't

We need to hear the engine sounds and them squealing tars along with HP Tuners...
No film schooling necessary boys

Love how the Tach goes red when you pass the gauges redline (not the limiter) 52MPH first gear when I had 3.42's
This was my very first data log when I didn't know ****... still don't


















