View Poll Results: Which one would you prefer if the Tahoe was yours?
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll
862s vs 243s on an LQ4
08-04-2021, 10:59 PM
#111
haha, yeah - something about the rotating mass of a 6cyl 408ci engine just don't appreciate moving that fast. crazy
as for the car, we've got her 'soft capped' at 6500, but the built 243s & cam could go 7000+ easily... it's just that poor stock LS1 block & rotating assembly we're trying to save. something about having full power & boost not too far above idle & then pulling up to whatever 650h/630t + 3psi equates to.
i don't believe there's an actual rev limiter set because it's a cog drive & we've seen that go south on other builds enough times.
as for the car, we've got her 'soft capped' at 6500, but the built 243s & cam could go 7000+ easily... it's just that poor stock LS1 block & rotating assembly we're trying to save. something about having full power & boost not too far above idle & then pulling up to whatever 650h/630t + 3psi equates to.
i don't believe there's an actual rev limiter set because it's a cog drive & we've seen that go south on other builds enough times.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
98mysticZ
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
09-10-2007 04:23 PM