GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

6.2 L92 Carb Intake & MSD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
fastgmc98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Southwest AZ
Default 6.2 L92 Carb Intake & MSD?

Can someone tell me if a site sponsor or any LSx store/shop has the GM Carb Intake for the 6.2 L92 and matching MSD 6LS-2 ignition for 58 tooth reluctor for sale... I would prefer to buy them from the same place if possible, a link would really be appreciated or phone #...

Thanks in advance
JB
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 04:18 PM
  #2  
TXoldskool's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: McKinney, TX
Default

They sell the GM box with or for the GM intake....and the MSD box with the Edelbrock Victor Jr. Not sure GM has a "package" with the MSD but someone like SDPC might have both.

If you're going to stay EFI you need the 88862 harness (MSD box) to connect the MSD to you EFI. I have one I bought by accident (thought I needed but don't for the carb setup) that I would sell at my cost shipped. Thats about $30 less then it cost me, plus you get the shipping included.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #3  
fastgmc98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Southwest AZ
Default

It's going to be a Carb set-up not EFI. On Scoggin Dickey's website, I see the GM Carb intake but don't see the MSD ignition for use with 58 tooth reluctor.... I'll keep searching their site plus other's though...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #4  
TXoldskool's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: McKinney, TX
Default

your looking for model 6LS-2 or part #6012 for LS2/LS7 w/58t...same as I bought.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #5  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

I'm not sure how good the Edelbrock intake is but I'd go with it before I'd go with the GM L92 intake.
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=399574
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:57 PM
  #6  
TXoldskool's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: McKinney, TX
Default

I wouldn't base my opinion off of those graphs alone. Mainly, because the 4.30 gears are quite a difference from 5.13's.

every test I've seen with a carb vs EFI scenario...the carb made more down low and up top...the EFI is strongest in the midrange though...where a car/truck "generally" lives on the street.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #7  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Moved this one to the GM Engine and Exhaust Performance section since an intake isn't quite "Internal"
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 06:52 AM
  #8  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by TXoldskool
I wouldn't base my opinion off of those graphs alone. Mainly, because the 4.30 gears are quite a difference from 5.13's.

every test I've seen with a carb vs EFI scenario...the carb made more down low and up top...the EFI is strongest in the midrange though...where a car/truck "generally" lives on the street.
The 5:13's are a HP loss vs 4.30's so that would make the carb intake look even worse if the test were done with the same gear. My seat of the pants dyno said the same results as the dyno numbers. I'm about to do try a L92 intake swap to try to get some of the low rpm torque back that the carb intake had. I lost about 2 mpg when I went away from the carb intake.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #9  
offroadrider12's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by TurboGibbs
The 5:13's are a HP loss vs 4.30's so that would make the carb intake look even worse if the test were done with the same gear. My seat of the pants dyno said the same results as the dyno numbers. I'm about to do try a L92 intake swap to try to get some of the low rpm torque back that the carb intake had. I lost about 2 mpg when I went away from the carb intake.
you got worse gas mileage with fuel injection than a carb?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #10  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by offroadrider12
you got worse gas mileage with fuel injection than a carb?
Carb intake plumbed for fuel injection.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCvet0311
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
12
Sep 30, 2015 10:34 AM
Droptoplt1ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
Aug 19, 2015 07:34 PM
Jblake
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
2
Aug 17, 2015 12:59 PM
USMCvet0311
NITROUS OXIDE
19
Jul 29, 2015 01:28 PM
Deceptarado
New Members
0
Jul 8, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.