GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

6.0 or 03 LS6 405 hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 08:59 PM
  #11  
Black02Z71's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by tooquick2beslo
I personally would rather have a warranty with the motor for at least one year.
No worries for one year and still have one hell of a engine that you know has 405 hp and you are not guessing at it. Just my opinion.
The motor I got from the salvage yard comes with a 1 year warranty. Remember torque is just as important as horsepower.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 09:15 PM
  #12  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

i agree... if you do alot of work with your vehicle i'd recomend the 6.0 or can't afford a stall to go with it. the 5.7 is a great buy, but in LS6 form it's going to need a stall to make it pull decent out of the hole at all. it would be nice to have the lower weight of the LS6 though. tough call on the two.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Default

really? the 6.l heads are that good
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:13 PM
  #14  
tooquick2beslo's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Va
Default

Originally Posted by Black02Z71
The motor I got from the salvage yard comes with a 1 year warranty. Remember torque is just as important as horsepower.
I didnt know that you could get a one year warranty frrom the junk yard.
Thats cool. yea you are right about the torque thing.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #15  
Black02Z71's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Lswonder
really? the 6.l heads are that good
Just see what patriot says about LQ9 6.0 heads. It does not mention the LQ4, but the LQ4 heads are the same casting as the LQ9.

Patriot performance LS6
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #16  
BADMOFO's Avatar
Cuz I AM a BADMOFO
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,624,039
Likes: 0
From: Mission to Uranus
Default

Originally Posted by Black02Z71
LS6 405HP #88984272 $5150 Long block

LQ9 345HP #88984279 $3095 Long Block

All you need is a cam in the 6.0 and it will make more power than the LS6.
I find it hard to believe that your are going to make 65hp from a cam swap in a 6.0L., and if you did, you would have to sacrifice a TON of streetability and drivability. With that being said, I would still go for the cammed up 6.0L with a Radix for the same money. My 6.0L (LQ4) was $1600 new (EBAY) and the true LS6 complete motor (which you would want for the intake, throttlebody, injectors, etc) is in the $7000 range. The LS6 swap is cool, but so is a blown 6 liter. ****, no matter what way you go you'll have a bad **** on your hands! And everyones' doin' 6.0 Liter swaps, the Z06 motor would definately be something different.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #17  
Black02Z71's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by BADMOFO
I find it hard to believe that your are going to make 65hp from a cam swap in a 6.0L., and if you did, you would have to sacrifice a TON of streetability and drivability. With that being said, I would still go for the cammed up 6.0L with a Radix for the same money. My 6.0L (LQ4) was $1600 new (EBAY) and the true LS6 complete motor (which you would want for the intake, throttlebody, injectors, etc) is in the $7000 range. The LS6 swap is cool, but so is a blown 6 liter. ****, no matter what way you go you'll have a bad **** on your hands! And everyones' doin' 6.0 Liter swaps, the Z06 motor would definately be something different.
All I am tring to say is, everything being the same, as in intake truck or LS6, exhaust, etc, the 6.0L will make more power. A cam swap in a 5.3l can gain 30-45+RWHP. You can't belive factory numbers, example a 5.3 is rated at 295 HP and a LQ4 6.0 is rated at 300HP, gm would have to detune the hell out of the 6.0 (as in computer) to get it down that low.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #18  
carbon04's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

LS6, 3200 stall, 4L80e, 150 shot <--- my plans

nuff said
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #19  
Scream's Avatar
MOOBIES Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,924
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by carbon04
LS6, 3200 stall, 4L80e, 150 shot <--- my plans

nuff said
Sounds familiar.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bearden86
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
26
Nov 15, 2015 03:58 PM
JordanH
WTB (Wanted To Buy)
4
Nov 6, 2015 07:42 PM
GMCtrk
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
18
Oct 6, 2015 03:48 PM
turbo6c3
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
1
Oct 5, 2015 06:11 PM
JoshH
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
Sep 28, 2015 11:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.