GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

5.3l pistons in a 4.8l?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
TyDreams's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default 5.3l pistons in a 4.8l?

I would like to build a Sy/Ty clone with the lsx motor and came across a 4.8l for next to nothing. After a little research i found that the 5.3 and 4.8 are the same except for the the 5.3 has a longer stroke so the pistons are dished to lower compression. So i was wondering if they would in the 4.8? I would like to lower the compression so the it would be easier to turbo charge and not spend a fortune to do it. I only want 450-500 horse so the stock parts from what i have read should hold up. It will also be backed with the 4l80e and a awd transfer case. With the 35/65 split (50/50 slipping) the stock drive system should also be fine for a while also.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #2  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Put LS6 heads on it. This is the perfect solution for you. It will lower your compression (61.15cc on the 4.8 head vs 64.45cc on the 243 head) and also the 243s flow a lot better. Win win and you can get them for about $450
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #3  
TyDreams's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

Hmmm, haven't thought of that.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #4  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

flat tops are better as well...better quench
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #5  
TyDreams's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

In this article it said that they have a 71cc http://www.enginebuildermag.com/Arti...all_block.aspx (you'll have to scroll down a little). I have read different threads and they all very. Could i use the 6.0l heads they are suppose to have 71cc? Would this drop compression too much?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 07:26 PM
  #6  
NateZQ8's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

You might not be able to run the bigger heads because of valve shrouding
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by NateZQ8
You might not be able to run the bigger heads because of valve shrouding
It should be fine. The new 5.3s come with LS6 heads right out of the factory with 2" intake valves
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #8  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

I'd just run the 4.8 as is, I made 500rwhp with a small cam and 11 psi of boost on a stock 4.8 motor.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #9  
SynergyV8's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: In the bar nearest you
Default

Originally Posted by kbracing96
I'd just run the 4.8 as is...
As would I. The stock 4.8L sits at 9.5:1 compression from the factory. That's perfect for 8-10psi, just make sure the intercooler does it's job. However, in an AWD vehicle, I would rather start with the 5.3L. They are the same cost, if not cheaper, from most junkyards than the 4.8L and will make 10% more torque everywhere.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #10  
TyDreams's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

What size turbo were you running to get that?
What was the redline at and dose it have the same redline as the 5.3.
I know that the 5.3 would put out a few more ponies but i can get a 4.8l for $200 and the 6.0 head run $200-300. So for $500 it wouldn't cost me to much. If i could run the 6.0 heads to lower compression to 8-8:5 i could turn the boost up a bit.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.