GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

408 teardown, pics inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 03:44 AM
  #31  
10 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 2
From: Near the 1320
Default

thats sucks atomic,get her fixed soon
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #32  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Gadgetized
That is normal. Especially on a FI engine where you are running on the rich side. They will look like that after a few minutes of running. The lighter color is just not covered with carbon yet.
I agree...most of the LS engines that I've seen are carbon monsters, even after just a short while of running...
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 09:45 AM
  #33  
Atomic's Avatar
Thread Starter
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Well thats comforting. I have plans for this engine...but it involves different pistons...

I am having a hell of a time trying to get the rod caps off, any suggestions?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #34  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Stick a hammer handle on the bottom of the piston and tap in the head of the hammer. That will pull the rod off the cap. That sucks, but looks like an oiling issue to me.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #35  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

The way Ive always done it is loosen the rod bolts half an inch then use a brass punch on the bolts and it will pop the rod loose from the cap then you can back the bolt out the rest of the way and go on with it.

Looks like the main bore wasnt checked and burnt up the thrust bearing. Maybe Ill change my theory after Im not looking at them on my phone.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #36  
Atomic's Avatar
Thread Starter
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Got them out with a rubber mallet, not too bad. Bottoms of the pistons look brand new, and the rod bearings on the crank dont look bad.

Cylinder walls are good,





The dark spot on the center journal is oil.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 12:30 PM
  #37  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,520
Likes: 244
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
... and the rod bearings on the crank dont look bad.
Compared to what? Even with forced induction, they should look new with your mileage. The damage showing on the rod half of the bearings, mainly the one on the right, doesn't look good. Top half damage indicates detonation. In your case, I'm wondering about oil starvation, with the burnt bearings and damage concentrated on the center main. Weird.
Originally Posted by Atomic
Cylinder walls are good, ...
It's hard to tell, the pics make them look shiny, like cylinders with a zillion miles look. In real life, do they look freshly honed, like they should?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #38  
Atomic's Avatar
Thread Starter
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

The crosshatching is still very evident on the cylinder walls. Im not sure where you are referring to on the crank rod bearings...
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #39  
custm2500's Avatar
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 5
Default

I am not an expert but I am 99% sure you were fat as hell and I bet you washed the bearing out with fuel. The pistons should not look anything like that!!!!!!!!!!! How did you tune this motor? Do you have a A/F ratios of what it was running through the rpm range?

Again I am not an expert but I am confident this was the main issue.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #40  
Atomic's Avatar
Thread Starter
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

11.3 at 2+ lbs of boost, 12.8 from 0 to 2lbs, and 14.45 at stoich.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.