GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

4.060" bore why or why not.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #1  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default 4.060" bore why or why not.

alright guys im looking into a 6.0 for the truck..
since i am planning on getting a motor completely rebuilt, i figure why not bore it .03 or .06.
i haven't heard anyone using 4.06" bore, will my temp be higher like the problem guys run into with iron 5.7's.
whats the capabilities of the cylinder wall on a IRON 6.0 block..
any info is good guys, thanks.
Jason

EDIT: this is for a DD N/A mild setup, im shooting for 400rwhp..

Last edited by pewterliftedz; Feb 12, 2010 at 03:46 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #2  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

anyone..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 10:47 PM
  #3  
built408's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth Texas
Default

Your not going to make much more, if any power doing it. But if you want to then go ahead, you won't have any problems with a 4.060 bore.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #4  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

I think alot has to do with the fact that is something would happen internally, maybe going with a smaller bore, you could resort to the .06 bore to save the block.. I am not sure how much you can safely go on a 6.0, on the 5.3's you start getting very thin on the cyl walls.. Your not getting that much more out of it, why not just stroke it if your looking for the extra cubes??
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

cool man... i guess if i end with a motor that needs to be rebuilt i'll do a 4.06" bore... if not i'll just stab the stock 4" bore in there
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

well mangled, iv just looking to uild a motor thats gonna last me another 100K.
from what iv heard strokers have more issues.. what do u think..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:10 PM
  #7  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

There is no issue doing a 30 over motor.. But once you go 60 if something should happen, you are not going to have much to over bore it if a cyl is messed up.. Strokers tend to burn oil more so then others. Alot form what I gather is improper piston, rod set ups, which cause alot of piston rock at the bottom of the stroke..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 11:16 PM
  #8  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

good info, thanks mangled
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #9  
batboy's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 6
From: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Default

I agree, no problem with a 0.030" over bore. But, going 0.060" might be pushing it a bit, thinning the cylinder walls, etc. Generally, I like to bore out a block just the minimum, that way you can bore it out again later if needed.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 10:40 PM
  #10  
BigHate's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

i have .040 over on my lq9. so far so good. #8 had a scratch on the wall so they bored till it was gone. i would have kept it the stock bore though if i could have
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.