GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

160 t-stat or 180 t-stat

Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #1  
04blackvho's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: austin tx
Default 160 t-stat or 180 t-stat

well going to get nelson tune should i get a 160 or 180 what do you guys use
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #2  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

I use a 160* with the whipple
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #3  
white06's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Nederland, Texas
Default

I found out the stock truck stat is 186 or 187. I couldn't find an actual 180.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #4  
FlaBouy's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 04blackvho
well going to get nelson tune should i get a 160 or 180 what do you guys use
Use a 160. My Blown AV runs around 180 with the 160 installed....
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #5  
03lowriderss's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

Slp 160*
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
treyZ28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, North Mexico
Default

180 unless you're boosted

no reason to go 160 at all. Less power, worse gas milage.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #7  
w41quad4's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

Less power & worse gas mileage, I really hope you have something to back that up, because i've experienced neither of those two problems running a 160* for the past few years. The truck once warmed up will still typically be in the 180 range.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
From: Spring, TX
Post

Originally Posted by treyZ28
180 unless you're boosted

no reason to go 160 at all. Less power, worse gas milage.
I'm kinda going to have to side with Trey on this one.
Not about the less power, but the worse MPG I agree on.
Not too sure how the 4.8 & 5.3L react to the 160* stat, but my VHO's LQ9 6.0L sure lost 1 mpg on average after dumping the factory stat for the SLP 160* stat.
It just takes way too long for the engine to warm up. During warm up it uses a tad more gas than when the engine is at close to normal operating temps.
Once it completely warms up, it does fine.
My 1/4mi times was 1/10th better after the 160* stat install. Could have just been a better run, but I didn't lose any 1/4mi time.
If I did it over, I would find out were to get a 170* stat.
A member here posted about finding one from somewhere, and it worked great for him.
Guess you would just need to do a little bit of research on it.

Jim
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #9  
getchusum99's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Baton rouge ,LA
Default

i have the 160' hypertech stat in my truck and did notice a slight drop in milage as well.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #10  
1slowsilverado's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach
Default

If I lost any gas milage it was slight. I went from stock 187 (ran 194) to a 160 (runs 172 now) I am running a tad more timing now and feels stronger all around. I'll keep an eye on my milage though...
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.