GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

TT3000 vs SST3200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #11  
chevyguy7802's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 0
From: Burleson,Texas
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
Damnit I hate this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



BTW looks like that is the verter for me! Thanks John



I feel ya man! This site has totally f'd my bank account!
Def spend the extra cash and get the 3200!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by chevyguy7802
I feel ya man! This site has totally f'd my bank account!
Def spend the extra cash and get the 3200!
Yep the only reason I am doing it is because I got a decent sized bonus up at work that is covering the mods...
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #13  
95ImpSS's Avatar
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Happy SST3200 owner here!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #14  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

since the sst3200 is a small converter, im under the impression that it would rev quicker, no?
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #15  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
since the sst3200 is a small converter, im under the impression that it would rev quicker, no?
I think the smallness of the converter make is more efficient in the higher RPM ranges...
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:11 PM
  #16  
dlt76028's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,883
Likes: 2
From: Crowley, TX
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
I think the smallness of the converter make is more efficient in the higher RPM ranges...
also looser and burns more gas.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #17  
tdrumm's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
From: Northeast, NJ
Default

I have the TT3000, and after driving it for a month, I wish I went with at least the SS3200, maybe even the SS3600.
The TT3000 is fairly tame around town, but I can still tell it is still there, and it doesn't hit really hard. I figure if I'm going to have the stop and go quirks of having a high stall converter, then I want something that really hits when I get a chance to get on it.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #18  
MeanZ71's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by tdrumm
I have the TT3000, and after driving it for a month, I wish I went with at least the SS3200, maybe even the SS3600.
The TT3000 is fairly tame around town, but I can still tell it is still there, and it doesn't hit really hard. I figure if I'm going to have the stop and go quirks of having a high stall converter, then I want something that really hits when I get a chance to get on it.
If you decide to swap out any time soon I'm looking at getting a TT3000 in the near future so just let me know and I'll gladly take it off your hands
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #19  
95ImpSS's Avatar
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by dlt76028
also looser and burns more gas.
18mpg (hwy), running rich. need to get my wideband wired so i can see what the AFR actually is.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 12:33 PM
  #20  
tdrumm's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
From: Northeast, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MeanZ71
If you decide to swap out any time soon I'm looking at getting a TT3000 in the near future so just let me know and I'll gladly take it off your hands
I'm tired of tearing my truck apart, so it is staying in there, I'm not unhappy with it, just some hindsight that I wanted to let the OP know.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.