PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

TT3000 vs SST3200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2008, 10:13 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
chevyguy7802's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Burleson,Texas
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by BlackGMC
Damnit I hate this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



BTW looks like that is the verter for me! Thanks John



I feel ya man! This site has totally f'd my bank account!
Def spend the extra cash and get the 3200!
chevyguy7802 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-13-2008, 10:16 PM
  #12  
Resident Retard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by chevyguy7802
I feel ya man! This site has totally f'd my bank account!
Def spend the extra cash and get the 3200!
Yep the only reason I am doing it is because I got a decent sized bonus up at work that is covering the mods...
BlackGMC is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-13-2008, 10:34 PM
  #13  
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
 
95ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Happy SST3200 owner here!
95ImpSS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-13-2008, 10:37 PM
  #14  
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
00ChevyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Over There
Posts: 10,261
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Default
since the sst3200 is a small converter, im under the impression that it would rev quicker, no?
00ChevyScott is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-13-2008, 10:39 PM
  #15  
Resident Retard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
since the sst3200 is a small converter, im under the impression that it would rev quicker, no?
I think the smallness of the converter make is more efficient in the higher RPM ranges...
BlackGMC is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-13-2008, 11:11 PM
  #16  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dlt76028's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Crowley, TX
Posts: 5,883
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by BlackGMC
I think the smallness of the converter make is more efficient in the higher RPM ranges...
also looser and burns more gas.
dlt76028 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-14-2008, 06:32 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
I have the TT3000, and after driving it for a month, I wish I went with at least the SS3200, maybe even the SS3600.
The TT3000 is fairly tame around town, but I can still tell it is still there, and it doesn't hit really hard. I figure if I'm going to have the stop and go quirks of having a high stall converter, then I want something that really hits when I get a chance to get on it.
tdrumm is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-14-2008, 09:40 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
MeanZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by tdrumm
I have the TT3000, and after driving it for a month, I wish I went with at least the SS3200, maybe even the SS3600.
The TT3000 is fairly tame around town, but I can still tell it is still there, and it doesn't hit really hard. I figure if I'm going to have the stop and go quirks of having a high stall converter, then I want something that really hits when I get a chance to get on it.
If you decide to swap out any time soon I'm looking at getting a TT3000 in the near future so just let me know and I'll gladly take it off your hands
MeanZ71 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-14-2008, 10:26 AM
  #19  
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
 
95ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by dlt76028
also looser and burns more gas.
18mpg (hwy), running rich. need to get my wideband wired so i can see what the AFR actually is.
95ImpSS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-14-2008, 12:33 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by MeanZ71
If you decide to swap out any time soon I'm looking at getting a TT3000 in the near future so just let me know and I'll gladly take it off your hands
I'm tired of tearing my truck apart, so it is staying in there, I'm not unhappy with it, just some hindsight that I wanted to let the OP know.
tdrumm is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: TT3000 vs SST3200


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.