GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

torque converter confusion

Old Mar 18, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #1  
06sierra5.3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 11
Default torque converter confusion

hey guys, i have an 06 sierra extended cab. 5.3 w/ intake, headers and exhuast. i am installing nelson tuned pcm, transgo shift kit, servos, accumulators and a torque converter. in the future i am doing a cam and heads, but not for a while. this is my question; the "converter selector" on yanks website says ill need the pt3200 for the mods i have planned, but a lot of you guys are running the tt3200. is the TT not enough for what im doing? or would the PT be overdoing it? i dont have any plans for forced induction, and i dont tow anything. its a daily driver. thanks
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #2  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

the tt3200 will be just fine. Plenty of guys are running the truck thruster in their daily drivers.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #3  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

there are tons of guys with the t3000 in their trucks

is the pt3200 a billet converter or something
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #4  
06sierra5.3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 11
Default

thats what i fgured. i was thinking the pt is more for retaining towability and forced induction.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #5  
06sierra5.3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 11
Default

also, whats the difference in performance of say a 10.5 in. vs. a 9.5 in. converter?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #6  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

not completely sure but i would think that the 9.5 would rev quicker than the 10.5 and i think the 9.5 is made for the cars and 10.5 for the trucks
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #7  
06sierra5.3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 11
Default

im gonna go with the yank sst3200, that should be good for what im doing now and when i get the cam and heads put in
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #8  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

For near-stock trucks it is fine, but I would not put a TT-series converter in any vehicle with a big displacement or FI motor, simply because it lacks a braised cover and (more importantly) an anti-ballooning plate.

Not having these items on a high-HP, high-rpm application is a recipe for taking out your tranny with an exploding torque converter.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #9  
06sierra5.3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 11
Default

whats the difference between the tt and the sst converters, and the most this converter will ever see is cam, heads, headers, intake, exhuast and tune. i also read a little bit about the fuddle converter, they have an anti-ballooning plate. anyone have info or experience with those? i guess im not really deticated to one or the other yet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
99bluefirebird
GM Parts Classifieds
4
Sep 17, 2015 08:05 PM
chvy=power
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 8, 2015 11:06 AM
Cowboy Tom
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
6
Sep 5, 2015 04:29 PM
KyleW707
GM Parts Classifieds
4
Jul 29, 2015 08:17 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.