GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

Gm 6l80e

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #31  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
Yeah, I thought it did but, GM Powertrains website is messed up so I couldn't check it.
I knew you did, just helping out.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #32  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Talking

Originally Posted by moregrip
I knew you did, just helping out.
I knew you knew I knew. Thanks for helping out.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #33  
James B.'s Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 3
From: 33.91° -117.48°
Default

It will be strong. The transmissions are what's been holding GM back from being more competitive both in terms of power level and number of gears. There's too much riding on this launch to screw it up.

As much as I'd love to, I have not yet seen any blueprints of the new design. I don't know how many planetaries it will have in it. It's possible to build a 6-speed with only 3, but also possible to build one with as many as 5. A five-planetary gearbox would allow for single-event clutch-to-clutch shifting where every shift is only a clutch-pack engage like a 4L80/85-E. That would be awesome, but unlikely due to weight and cost. The most likely configuration will be a 3-planetary geartrain where some shift are a combination of an engage and a disengage of certain clutch pack or (hopefully not) band(s).

It could, in theory, go something like this:

First = forward clutch pack engage.
Second = clutch pack 1 engage
Third = clutch pack 2 engage, clutch pack 1 disengage
Fourth = clutch pack 3 engage, clutch pack 2 disengage
Fifth = clutch pack 3 holding, clutch pack 1 engage
Sixth clutch pack 3 and 1 holding, clutch pack 2 engage

Just a theory....

I'm not a fan of multiple-event shifts. To me those feel sloppy and unprecise. Of course single-event shifts would be cost-prohibitive.

I have heard the comment made in certain GM correspondance saying something like "It is cheaper and easier to build a 6-speed than a 5-speed." This leads me to believe that the 5-speed would have four planetary gearsets while the 6-speed has only 3.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #34  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Well knowing the road less traveled (quality over cost) and the road more traveled (fear over quality), I'm not holding my breath for the higher quality product scenario.

James - if they go for the 3-planetary gearbox, would this behave better than a 4L80 routed through a GV box?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: in the Trans Am
Default

i wonder how much it weighs?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #36  
James B.'s Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 3
From: 33.91° -117.48°
Default

Originally Posted by Naked AV
James - if they go for the 3-planetary gearbox, would this behave better than a 4L80 routed through a GV box?
That depends on how you define "behave"

The Gear Vendors OD is not computer controlled. It does not know or care what gear your trans is in, what your speed is, what your throttle position is or whatever. It simply works. It has a controller, but all the controller does is prevent operation at low speeds since the unit is powered by a pump turning at input shaft speed. It has a limited auto-drive mode which basically just engages and disengages the OD at certain speeds. It also has a few inputs that can be used to lock out operation - such as when in 4x4 mode or when in factory OD to prevent double-OD. The controller keeps track of how many times it's engaged. That's it. It is not automatic.

I define "behavior" as something that produces predictable results consistently at a high quality. The Gear Vendors OD does that. What it is not is integrated into the factory electronics to correspond with OEM shifting in any way. In that respect a fully self-contained OEM 6-speed would "behave" better than the 8-speed combination of 4L80-E and GV-OD. I like having 8-speeds on tap but I never use first over. My 4L80-E 2-3 WOT upshift takes place at about 65MPH which really means I have to be going 60 or less (based on a 5mph hysteresis) to get a downshift hit to second. Everyone knows how much more fun a 4-2 downshift is than a 4-3. The 4-2 is much more violent because you'll land right at the engine's peak HP. Witht he GV engage the WOT upshift moves to about 80mph which means I only need to be going less than 75mph for a good 4-2 hit. There are some instances on the freeway when it's important to let a bonehead driver know they've made a move which should be considered inappropriate. With a quick push of the foot switch for the GV I can ensure myself a strong 4-2 downshift over a much broader RPM range. I've got a stock converter in this thing, it has something like a 1800RPM stall speed. lol With the GV I can make up the ratio gap between the OEM gears with the splitter. It's fun.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 11:58 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default

I want one,I guess I'll have to find a wrecked Caddy next fall.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 08:22 AM
  #38  
marc_w's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

I don't know... I think I like my four-speed.

My buddies Jag X-type has a 5 or 6 speed tranny - not totally sure which, I just know it's got a crazy deep first gear and it shifts a lot. It also feels like it has a rather loose converter - 2500 to 3000rpm (no exaggeration there). It sure gets around nice and quick, but the tranny and drive by wire TB are always busy.

My sportbikes also have 6 speed close ratio trannies. I've grown to hate those bikes. I get so sick of shifting, that I skip gears when I commute on them. 1st to 2nd. 2nd past 3rd to 4th. 4th past 5th to 6th. It makes getting around much more enjoyable.

Another example, Lately, I've found it pretty enjoyable to disable TCC lockup in my stock converter and tranny. I just let it shift through it's 4 gears and that's it.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 06:36 AM
  #39  
mykdiver's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

Cool, that sounds good to me. It is about time they made a better tranny than the 4L60E....
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #40  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

Wow thats a incredable amout of drag and wieght just for more gears James B. I just do not see the point other then being picky about gears like you stated above. Your excessiveness in drivetrain always gets me. Have you broke 14's yet?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.