FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

TVS2300 on an 8.1L.....thoughts, opinions, feedback.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009, 08:26 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Whippled 496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lake Shore, MD
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
Hell I can get into boost at 35% throttle.
Problem is the RPMs that are needed to get this blower to start making boost on an 8.1L engine are rediculous. I have a 2-3/8" blower pulley on there too ..........just another reason why the Whipple is just not getting the job done.
Old 05-06-2009, 08:41 PM
  #22  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (3)
 
BigCountryx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah, part throttle maggie boost feels soooo good. that was a little 112 on a 6.0
Old 05-07-2009, 02:16 AM
  #23  
TECH Veteran
 
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whippled 496
I think they mean how quickly you can get to boost from idle. I can be at full boost in a half second or less when I punch it off the line.
I'm talking RPM, not time. Shouldn't the Whipple be @ full boost by 2000 RPM?
Old 05-07-2009, 05:03 AM
  #24  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Whippled 496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lake Shore, MD
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Sandog
I'm talking RPM, not time. Shouldn't the Whipple be @ full boost by 2000 RPM?
2000 engine RPM is not even close to being able to spin this blower fast enough for "full boost"...LOL. Thats what I am hoping the TVS will be able to do with some different pulley arrangements.
Old 05-07-2009, 02:33 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
 
TieRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC MO
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whippled 496
2000 engine RPM is not even close to being able to spin this blower fast enough for "full boost"...LOL. Thats what I am hoping the TVS will be able to do with some different pulley arrangements.
I think there havin a hard time wrapping there head around how much air the 8.1l moves. LOL
Old 05-07-2009, 02:56 PM
  #26  
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
thunder550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TieRod
I think there havin a hard time wrapping there head around how much air the 8.1l moves. LOL
LS motors in the 420's and 430's are making 800+ lb-ft in the low 2000 RPM range with the TVS2300. I still think there's something wrong with the setup. What size is that Whipple?
Old 05-07-2009, 03:47 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Whippled 496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lake Shore, MD
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its a standard 2.3L compressor.

James B, has had this same issue as well as a few other 8.1L people who just cant make enough boost for the 8.1L with a Whipple. If you look on Whipples site in the marine section you can see the different setups for the 8.1Ls. Their lower performance setups (5psi or less) use the W140ax (2.3L) compressor. The higher performance setups (6psi and +) use the W200ax (3.3L) compressor. So its seems apparent that Whipple also understands that the 2.3L compressor will not get the job done on these 8.1Ls over 5psi. At least not thier compressor anyway (Brian says the TVS will even though its the same size) Right Brian?....Right? You add the Air to water intercooler core to my setup and you loose a little more boost.
Old 05-07-2009, 04:15 PM
  #28  
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
thunder550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Still, I would think that at lower RPM's and part throttle you would be able to make boost. The place where I would expect to see the smaller compressor struggle is at WOT at high RPM's, not at low RPM part throttle.
Old 05-07-2009, 04:29 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Whippled 496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lake Shore, MD
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by thunder550
Still, I would think that at lower RPM's and part throttle you would be able to make boost. The place where I would expect to see the smaller compressor struggle is at WOT at high RPM's, not at low RPM part throttle.
You have to look at the Lysholm map to see what i mean. 7.5" crank pulley with a 2.375" blower pulley maths out to be 3.16x over driven. So 3.16 x 2000 (engine) RPM = 6320 (blower) RPM. 6320 blower RPM does not provide nearly enough air for 4.05L's of cylinder volume when you look at the 2.3L Whipple compressor MAP. I am not sure about the TVS MAP, but the ability to over drive the blower even more using the jack shaft setup, will allow for more air at lower engine RPMs thus more boost at part throttle.....I HOPE

Actually it would be cool to see a TVS cross flow chart of how much boost you would create, given cylinder volume vs blower speed if someone smarter than me (and God knows there are plenty out there) would like to do it.

Last edited by Whippled 496; 05-07-2009 at 04:37 PM.
Old 05-07-2009, 05:02 PM
  #30  
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
thunder550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ahh I gotcha...I was wondering how much that thing was overdriven, doesn't sound like too much. I know the numbers that I have seen with the TVS are all overdriven to produce a peak of anywhere from 14-18 psi. I guess it would be a little soft down low if it was only peaking at 6psi.


Quick Reply: TVS2300 on an 8.1L.....thoughts, opinions, feedback.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.