TVS 1900 vs radix mp112
Nov 16, 2009 | 09:39 PM
#14
The 1900 is bigger (same size as mp122) and is capable of more boost before heating things up too much. Compared to a 112, it's just bigger and better all over. You can use a little more cam with the TVS. Anything bigger than a mild cam is kind of a waste with a 112. A big cam might sound good, but the numbers aren't there if you're already pullied down to a 2.9" drive pulley.
Nov 17, 2009 | 09:22 PM
#16
I replaced my MP112/2.9" pulley setup with a TVS1900/2.9 pulley setup (all on a 6.0L motor). My peak boost went from ~8.4ish to ~9.0.
The 112 is a great kit. Big HP gains with a nice setup and like others say, gobs of power down low. It feels and shows on my scan that the 1900 creates about a pound of boost less in the first second of a launch than the 112. But because the 1900 is just kicking the 112 *** in IAT efficiency it allows you to keep good timing in the setup late down the track. The radix is still a great setup IMO, especially for the prices you can snag one up.
The 112 is a great kit. Big HP gains with a nice setup and like others say, gobs of power down low. It feels and shows on my scan that the 1900 creates about a pound of boost less in the first second of a launch than the 112. But because the 1900 is just kicking the 112 *** in IAT efficiency it allows you to keep good timing in the setup late down the track. The radix is still a great setup IMO, especially for the prices you can snag one up.
Nov 17, 2009 | 10:21 PM
#17
I replaced my MP112/2.9" pulley setup with a TVS1900/2.9 pulley setup (all on a 6.0L motor). My peak boost went from ~8.4ish to ~9.0.
The 112 is a great kit. Big HP gains with a nice setup and like others say, gobs of power down low. It feels and shows on my scan that the 1900 creates about a pound of boost less in the first second of a launch than the 112. But because the 1900 is just kicking the 112 *** in IAT efficiency it allows you to keep good timing in the setup late down the track. The radix is still a great setup IMO, especially for the prices you can snag one up.
The 112 is a great kit. Big HP gains with a nice setup and like others say, gobs of power down low. It feels and shows on my scan that the 1900 creates about a pound of boost less in the first second of a launch than the 112. But because the 1900 is just kicking the 112 *** in IAT efficiency it allows you to keep good timing in the setup late down the track. The radix is still a great setup IMO, especially for the prices you can snag one up.
Nov 18, 2009 | 03:01 AM
#18
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Nov 18, 2009 | 10:20 AM
#19
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: washington state
without them I probably never would of attempted this, they told me it wont be that difficult to get it running, and not much modification is required. fortunatly the 3rd gen doesnt have the engine under the windshield like the 4th gens, so fitment issues wont be a problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
