Turbo vs. Supercharger
Nov 13, 2012 | 07:40 PM
#21
Nov 14, 2012 | 06:11 AM
#22
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Turbo on a 6.2, turbo on a 6.0,5.3,4.8 they all look the same. The kits are layed out the same from engine to engine, primary differences are the turbo and waste gate size unless you get into a T-6.
What do you want to do with your truck, that will better answer which one is the best rather then a bunch of peoples opinions.
What do you want to do with your truck, that will better answer which one is the best rather then a bunch of peoples opinions.
Nov 14, 2012 | 06:21 AM
#23
I was running 13.2@ 2000'da with my full bolt on 6.0. But either one will get you into the 12s. Turbos are great and sound awesome. But so are superchargers. That's why I went halfway and got the procharger.
Nov 14, 2012 | 07:15 AM
#24
I had a Magnacharger, and am in the middle of switching to a turbo. I really liked the instant torque of the supercharger, but I only had a 112, and my HP goals well exceeded that. You really need to determine what your max HP goals are, and go from there. The supercharger is nice for instant torque, but you give up a few HP by turning the unit. What will you be doing with the truck, and how much HP are you looking for?
Nov 14, 2012 | 12:12 PM
#27
I started with a simple intake, exhaust and tune with my 6.2
Then got the Procharger. Fell in love with boost. Blew the motor up, upgraded pretty much everything inside it and now want to go even farther.
Boost/HP is addicting. The feeling you get when you are in a CC work truck and a Vette pulls up along side you and you know you can smoke him always brings a smile to my face.
