Turbo guru's 6.0 recommendations
#31
Originally Posted by hellbents10
You mean by 88 you mean exducer sizer and not inducer which is what these gays are speaking of.
Also at 15 psi or better the 40-67 is not the best choice. You would be better off with a 42-72 (or76 if you would like to move a little more air) Or a S72, which takes a little longer to spool but will ultimatly make more power because of the better flwing wheel.
Also at 15 psi or better the 40-67 is not the best choice. You would be better off with a 42-72 (or76 if you would like to move a little more air) Or a S72, which takes a little longer to spool but will ultimatly make more power because of the better flwing wheel.
#32
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Originally Posted by zippy
#33
Definatly not on the large side for a 6.0l, Zippy is on the right track with that turbo, it will work very well on a mild 6.0l. Infact that would be great for a entry level up to 700rwhp or so turbo on a 6.0l.
#34
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
I just bought it. It is supposed to be capable of 1200hp but on the inefficient system I will have I'd be more than happy with 700@ the flywheel. 600+ rwhp on a real world DD is enough i think 
Now I just need recommendations on a boost controler, wastegate, and blowoff valve.

Now I just need recommendations on a boost controler, wastegate, and blowoff valve.
#36
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Yeah. The more I thought about it the radix just wasn't what I needed. It is a great system for up to just a little over stock . Other than that it just isn't the best way to go. The radix does perfect for what it was designed to do though.
It's gonna be fun
It's gonna be fun



that ought to get you up to a boost level to make the low compression worth it.