FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

super vic jr.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #1  
05crew's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Benson NC
Default super vic jr.

what is the diff. in a super vic jr. and a vic jr intake. what will work better on a turbo 408?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #2  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

might double check but i believe that the super vic jr. doesnt have fuel injector bungs, but i may be wrong
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #3  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 242
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

From Edelbrock's website:

"Super Victor EFI LS1 manifold #28095 is for high-output competition EFI systems and features precisely positioned and machined injector bosses for excellent fuel spray patterns and maximum power."
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #4  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

my bad, must be thinkin of something else

EDIT, i was thinking of the performer rpm

the only difference i can find between the vic jr. and the super vic is the super is about 1.1" taller
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

I believe it has to do with the hieght/length of the runners which has to do with the rpm range....
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 09:12 PM
  #6  
05crew's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Benson NC
Default

so it would be good for the turbo setup? i would think so because of the long runners
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 09:13 PM
  #7  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by 05crew
so it would be good for the turbo setup? i would think so because of the long runners
Be the test mule..
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #8  
Mort's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Default

Will the super fit under the hood?

The shorter runners must be better for low end torque and therefore better on the street and the long runners better for top end and therefore better for an all out track truck. Depends on your goals. I have read the theory but I am not sure if I have it right or exactly what the effect of either will be on drive-ability or how it ties in with your turbo.

I would try to determine which will suit your build and goals and then you can make a more informed decision.

Maybe Richard at WCCH can help steer you in the right direction. I think he sells Edelbrock.

Nice build you are doing!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #9  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by Mort
Will the super fit under the hood?

The shorter runners must be better for low end torque and therefore better on the street and the long runners better for top end and therefore better for an all out track truck. Depends on your goals. I have read the theory but I am not sure if I have it right or exactly what the effect of either will be on drive-ability or how it ties in with your turbo.

I would try to determine which will suit your build and goals and then you can make a more informed decision.

Maybe Richard at WCCH can help steer you in the right direction. I think he sells Edelbrock.

Nice build you are doing!
I believe you have it backwards... Short runners have a higher air intake velocity which hurts lowend but help upper rpm HP. Long runners have a lower air intake velocity which helps lowend TQ... At least that is what i remember reading....
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #10  
Mort's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
I believe you have it backwards... Short runners have a higher air intake velocity which hurts lowend but help upper rpm HP. Long runners have a lower air intake velocity which helps lowend TQ... At least that is what i remember reading....

LOL....you are probably correct. I read these things out of general interest and often seem to get it wrong from memory. Sorry if I mislead anyone.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.