FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

STS Pro's and Con's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #21  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

MY old 60-1 had a hard time keeping up with the 6.0, but there was very little lag as far as a STS kit. now I have the GT67 and run 12 psi with the 6.0. I think the GT67 is a good choice.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #22  
TG02Z71's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

Its hard for me to post pros when comparing to other systems. I don't have nor ever did have anyone else's FI system on any vehicle.
What I can tell you is the system was easy to install by a first timer.
It took me longer than I thought it would, but my buddy who is an engineer also helped me do the install.
Whenever you get two engineer types together on a project there seems to be a lot of takling about what to do when and why even though you have clearly maked installation instructions.
My truck was up and running that night and we went for some test driving around the industrial park where I work. Systsem works great at the 5psi base kit level.
Its easy to upgrade too. Just costs money like everything else.
The only other real gripe I have would be the quality of the hose clamps.
I have since replaced allot of mine with T-bolt clamps for peace of mind.
Never had one pop off or leak.
Seems like an extra $100.00 added to the base kit price and being provided with the better clamps should be done.
There are allot of hose connections in the kit but it really only takes a few minutes to check them all every week or so.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #23  
JOHN1L40's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AintNoHo
The jury was still out for me on the STS setup, but after thinking about your post I think getting an STS would be a mistake for me. Why did I buy a 4x4 truck/SUV? To be able to tow and to go places cars can't. Deep snow, mud, brush, etc., back a boat into water, cross a stream to go shooting, it would be hard to do that again without a lot of worry. Underhood heat is a problem with a turbo, but I think the STS solution creates more problems.
I have to tell you that although you may hear a lot of conflicting information the STS kit is awsome. I tow ALL the time and I am OFF -ROAD when I tow. I had to move the filter up into the bed for deep water and I only tow with low boost (5 psi).

You can look at my sig at the bottom to see my set up. If you want to PM me I can give you some real world stats. (EGT's, A\F, Tranny temps, engine temps, HP \ TQ etc.)
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #24  
TURBO8's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco Ca
Default

I agree those clamps suck. But I had a boost spike of 22psi and the pipes didn't blow off!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #25  
NoChrome's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Edwards AFB CA
Default

What all is NEEDED to install the sts kit, and make it run right.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #26  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

a good tune, larger injectors and a larger fuel pump really woke my truck up from the stock fuel system, some guys can get by on stock fuel system at 5#, 04s are supposibly notorious for weak fuel supply.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #27  
TG02Z71's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by TIM Z
TG02Z71, how would i know if i have the old style piping?, does sts replace it with a new one for free, i stiil have my kit under 1 year warranty, i got the kit last feburary, as far as the snorkel kit, they sold it to me at cost,40$ i believe, so you might want to check in to it.

Sorry I forgot the question earlier. The old style piping has the wategate close to the turbo inlet. The newer style has the wastegate about a foot or so back and has its own small tailpipe for the wastegate. The old style had the wastegate venting to the turbo's exhaust. This is where you would get condensation running down into the wstegate and freezing when very cold temp happen.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #28  
TIM Z's Avatar
11 sec. Truck Mod
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,736
Likes: 4
From: OH IO :(
Default

Originally Posted by TG02Z71
Sorry I forgot the question earlier. The old style piping has the wategate close to the turbo inlet. The newer style has the wastegate about a foot or so back and has its own small tailpipe for the wastegate. The old style had the wastegate venting to the turbo's exhaust. This is where you would get condensation running down into the wstegate and freezing when very cold temp happen.
thanx for the reply, i guess ive got the old style piping, no problems with it, but i always want to have the latest refined version, i guess when i order my intercooler i'll have em send me a new pipe.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 08:53 AM
  #29  
MrXerox's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Can anyone post of pic of old vs. new?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #30  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

There's the new setup:
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.