FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

STS non IC vs. IC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
coryhussey's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: lasalle ontario canada
Default STS non IC vs. IC

Hey, just a thought. I am looking at a sts kit that is non-ic, is this going to be less turbo lag than a IC setup. It seems like the longer pipes for an IC will take more time to spool up, but produce more power once it hits. The non-IC will be quicker, but not as much of a power hit?? Am I wrong, or am I blowing steam out my ***.

cory
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #2  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

No you'd be right. you lose about between 1-3 psi across an intercooler as well. You'd have less lag but your IAT would be alot higher which can be controlled by using meth. For DD'ing application I would suggest an IC. Just think of an IC as a big void space that has to be pressurized prior to your engine seeing the boost . Granted it fills up rather fast but without it there your engine would see boost that much faster.
On a side note most of your boost lose across your intercooler is due to the change in density of your charge and not because you magically lose boost pressure.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #3  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

Go with the IC version. Having a intercooler on your setup is much better than not having one.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
On a side note most of your boost lose across your intercooler is due to the change in density of your charge and not because you magically lose boost pressure.
would you mind clearing that statement up?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #5  
Stoichiometric's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
From: Way out there
Default

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ai...ity-d_771.html

Good link for quick reference. As density increases pressure decreases. There are some frictional losses from the intercooler also.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:05 PM
  #6  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Stoichiometric
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ai...ity-d_771.html

Good link for quick reference. As density increases pressure decreases. There are some frictional losses from the intercooler also.
i understand the frictional losses.....but the other part is just the opposite of what I thought. Interesting, I guess it makes sense....now that I noodle it.

Julien you are my hero.....fuggabunchofturbos
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #7  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

As long as your waste gate ref line is at the intake manifold, you will not see ANY drop in pressure. I ran no charge cooler for quite a few months before getting my e-bay cooler, at which point I never notice any lag increase. not saying it doesn't increase lag, but the about is un-noticeable... or I can't remember it lol.....

Also, even though the density has increase and pressure decreased. (mostly do to the slower cooler moving air in the charge air cooler), the spring in the waste gate still relies on pressure to operate, so if your ref line is after the charge cooler you peak boost pressure will not change.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #8  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

I guess I needed to rethink "turbo" for a second.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #9  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

I dont this that you really need to worry about loosing power because of running a IC. As Spoolin said it is much safer reliable and it will also give you more room to grow if you ever step up your setup.

And Inter Coolers must be the way to go because Magna Chargers come with them.....>Right Blown
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #10  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 8ALTNG
I dont this that you really need to worry about loosing power because of running a IC. As Spoolin said it is much safer reliable and it will also give you more room to grow if you ever step up your setup.

And Inter Coolers must be the way to go because Magna Chargers come with them.....>Right Blown


Intercoolers are the way to go because they provide better performance
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.