Reliability / Longevity
May 16, 2007 | 03:41 PM
#11
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Originally Posted by Brian@JPA
How can I argue with a guy that knows the history of the Ferrari F-150 
ummm...you forgot to add something deragatory like, I'm gay, queer, stupid...I think that's your favorite part!
May 16, 2007 | 03:49 PM
#12
My truck is going on 3 years with a Turbo and I have put right around 35,000 miles on that Turbo system with no problems (50,000 miles on the truck total)... I don't count destroying the transmission as a "problem", just a needed upgrade with any FI upgrade...
May 16, 2007 | 04:08 PM
#13
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: colorado above 6000 ft.
Originally Posted by Brian@JPA
Never said the STS was better....I said the STS makes good top end power. The power of the turbo on the top end vs the MP112 that I had on the truck is night and day. You will never find me saying the STS is better than the Radix, its not possible for it to be better.....it just has the potential to make more power due to the availability of the bigger turbo.
Do I like the turbo system, yes...the power over the blower is better....Do I like driving it, sure its fun....simply because I have never owned one. Do I miss the low end of the Radix, Yes. I am luckier than some because I have had the opportunity to drive/own both on the same vehicle.
Again, I don't "hate the STS" I just do not like the lack of bottom end power, I NEVER said that the STS was the BEST.
Hope that clears up the confusion.
Do I like the turbo system, yes...the power over the blower is better....Do I like driving it, sure its fun....simply because I have never owned one. Do I miss the low end of the Radix, Yes. I am luckier than some because I have had the opportunity to drive/own both on the same vehicle.
Again, I don't "hate the STS" I just do not like the lack of bottom end power, I NEVER said that the STS was the BEST.
Hope that clears up the confusion.
Thats cool I respect your oppinion.
Thats why I went with the front mount. The STS kit has a long way to travel I believe thats where the low end power has been lost. My new setup makes boost pretty much instantly. I am more than pleased with the Low end power the Trick setup makes. And with the coated pipes my under hood temps seem pretty much stock.
May 16, 2007 | 04:19 PM
#14
Originally Posted by WJ MARK
Thats cool I respect your oppinion. Thats why I went with the front mount. The STS kit has a long way to travel I believe thats where the low end power has been lost. My new setup makes boost pretty much instantly. I am more than pleased with the Low end power the Trick setup makes. And with the coated pipes my under hood temps seem pretty much stock.
Thats why I went with the front mount. The STS kit has a long way to travel I believe thats where the low end power has been lost. My new setup makes boost pretty much instantly. I am more than pleased with the Low end power the Trick setup makes. And with the coated pipes my under hood temps seem pretty much stock.There you have it......We will see what happens once the TVS becomes available
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slocaddy
FUEL SYSTEMS
2
Sep 25, 2015 12:42 PM
scooter k
FORCED INDUCTION
20
Sep 16, 2015 10:32 PM