Radix or Whipple?
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:01 PM
#21
Launching!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
So all I have to do is bolt on a magnacharger run 12psi and poof 575whp? Are any other seeing these type of results?
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:05 PM
#22
What exactly is your problem?
The dyno numbers aren't important for anything other than tuning and upgrade comparison. It wouldn't matter if it read 356hp now would it? The track times speak for themselves and my truck is parked outside my door and driven every damn day.
The dyno numbers aren't important for anything other than tuning and upgrade comparison. It wouldn't matter if it read 356hp now would it? The track times speak for themselves and my truck is parked outside my door and driven every damn day.
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:18 PM
#23
I don't need to shut anything. Clearly the forum shut you up being you were a FORMER maggie vendor for this forum. I understand why your panties may be in a bunch since your a maggie cheerleader.
I can back it up with just telling someone to use the search function if they want to dispute my statement. This isn't a court I don't need to bring examples to prove my case. The facts speak for itself anyways. Just look threw old threads.
Congrats on 30000 blowers sold but are you trying to tell me you have a only had 25 complaints? I highly doubt it.
I think there are probably more lysolm/whipple blowers running around out there whether they are on boats, rebranded and sold for bmws, audis, ect. Why is it I have never seen anyone running a maggie on their BBC boat motors or other than gm and a select few of other cars, but I have seen the whipple unit run on tons of different apps? Must be because your oh so special magnacharger is a better blower...
I can back it up with just telling someone to use the search function if they want to dispute my statement. This isn't a court I don't need to bring examples to prove my case. The facts speak for itself anyways. Just look threw old threads.
Congrats on 30000 blowers sold but are you trying to tell me you have a only had 25 complaints? I highly doubt it.
I think there are probably more lysolm/whipple blowers running around out there whether they are on boats, rebranded and sold for bmws, audis, ect. Why is it I have never seen anyone running a maggie on their BBC boat motors or other than gm and a select few of other cars, but I have seen the whipple unit run on tons of different apps? Must be because your oh so special magnacharger is a better blower...
FORMER......you are funny.
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:21 PM
#24
Launching!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
What exactly is your problem?
The dyno numbers aren't important for anything other than tuning and upgrade comparison. It wouldn't matter if it read 356hp now would it? The track times speak for themselves and my truck is parked outside my door and driven every damn day.
The dyno numbers aren't important for anything other than tuning and upgrade comparison. It wouldn't matter if it read 356hp now would it? The track times speak for themselves and my truck is parked outside my door and driven every damn day.
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:22 PM
#25
For the record maggie sells an Eaton Based Blower, They are An OE Manufactured supplier, And are used in several different apps, Such As Ford, Jag's,and several dif gm equipped vehicles. Just to name a few. There are several dif blowers and several dif uses of them. As for the OP intended use a maggie can fit the requirements asked.
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:24 PM
#27
I'd go with a whipple. Once you get everything sorted you will have a better blower setup than with a maggie.
I am making 395whp and 424trq on mustang dyno with a 5200 redline at 10psi. That equals about 445-450whp and 500trq on a dynojet.
The maggie is less efficent at higher boost levels so I don't think that it would be an optimal choice.
I am making 395whp and 424trq on mustang dyno with a 5200 redline at 10psi. That equals about 445-450whp and 500trq on a dynojet.
The maggie is less efficent at higher boost levels so I don't think that it would be an optimal choice.
The TVS is more efficent than a Radix. Go find a map of both Whipple & a TVS, that could be some insight, good or bad.
You beg to differ what?
I am pretty sure the maggie will max out before the whipple correct and the whipple is more efficient at higher boost levels.
I have never had one issue related to my whipple. I don't have slip problems or anything. There are plenty of knowledgeable whipple guys on here also. I do see a lot of guys running into trouble with the maggies though.
I am pretty sure the maggie will max out before the whipple correct and the whipple is more efficient at higher boost levels.
I have never had one issue related to my whipple. I don't have slip problems or anything. There are plenty of knowledgeable whipple guys on here also. I do see a lot of guys running into trouble with the maggies though.
OP wants 550-600RWHP, Bill's @ 575. Furthermore, that's w/. a 1900. How big is a Whipple? I'm guessin 2.2L. OK, so how bout a TVS2300 go toe-toe w/. a Whipple 2.2 on a 6L.
Claim? Why are u bashin Bill now? He's givin u some insight to his combo, & you're brow-beating him.
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:34 PM
#29
Launching!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
I said Former on this forum! Which it would appear you are, I don't the "supporting vendor" above you name anymore. Are you currently a vendor right now? Your pretty funny too with your emo I done with this forum threads, but here you are.
Nov 19, 2009 | 04:38 PM
#30
Wow those are great numbers! How does a dynapack dyno compare to mustang numbers? I am pretty sure a dynapack reads a lot higher. Your track times are great.
So all I have to do is bolt on a magnacharger run 12psi and poof 575whp? Are any other seeing these type of results?
So all I have to do is bolt on a magnacharger run 12psi and poof 575whp? Are any other seeing these type of results?
Can the blower compete sure spend some money and time it is worth it.I am probly the first guy that has rengineered this setup and so far the benifts our there.I have seen 17psi at 78iat's with ambient of 65.The truck will make the power jus need injectors better tune and more money lmao.In a 4.8 that should put it somwhere around 600-650rwhp but talk cheap so will see.