ok FI questions... compression 10.3:1
#1
ok guys, so Im doing a l92 swap on my 6 liter lq9 and was going to stay NA and run 11:1. but... now Ive been doing research, and Im planing for my future goals. Ive decided not to mill my l92 heads. That way I can bring my compression down for FI by next summer. I was still going to run a .040 gasket with the L92 heads. from what I research Ill be at 10.3:1
that said, what type of boost can I go with? I would like turbo just cause its such a bad *** setup and sounds cool. plus I think a supercharger might fall short. The lq9 block is stock, so not trying to blow it up either.
Ive talked to KB racing and he recomended a S475?? But I seen a stage 3 on Trick Website... so Im not sure what to do, or if to peice it together.
here are some specs I have to work with. Cam is it, not changing soon. from my research seems like with the l92s this cam will be just fine boosted.
227/235 .614/.621 113
lq9 with l92s
3200 stall 4l80e 3.73
I have lpp 1 3/4 headers but I can sell to fund the build.
with the l92 setup and 11:1 na that combo is good for 450-500rwhp through manual setups.
with my few points short on compression, but with the turbo... Im wondering if this setup will produce near 6-650rwp?? and still be daily driveable with manners?
that said, what type of boost can I go with? I would like turbo just cause its such a bad *** setup and sounds cool. plus I think a supercharger might fall short. The lq9 block is stock, so not trying to blow it up either.
Ive talked to KB racing and he recomended a S475?? But I seen a stage 3 on Trick Website... so Im not sure what to do, or if to peice it together.
here are some specs I have to work with. Cam is it, not changing soon. from my research seems like with the l92s this cam will be just fine boosted.
227/235 .614/.621 113
lq9 with l92s
3200 stall 4l80e 3.73
I have lpp 1 3/4 headers but I can sell to fund the build.
with the l92 setup and 11:1 na that combo is good for 450-500rwhp through manual setups.
with my few points short on compression, but with the turbo... Im wondering if this setup will produce near 6-650rwp?? and still be daily driveable with manners?
#2
im about 60% leaning to procharger as I have headers and exhaust already.... not just contemplating that part is done...
would the procharger run on 10.8 to 11:1 compression or keep it low still like 10.3:1
would the procharger run on 10.8 to 11:1 compression or keep it low still like 10.3:1
#5
With the D1 I would run 10.3 like you are talking about. A D1 will keep up fine. I would use boost to build cyl pressure at that point over compression.
D1 and 10.3-1, run good fuel and meth or e85. A procharger setup with L92 heads would do better with more exhaust duration on the cam but that should still work fine. That cam with your stall speed should be a decent match. Is your truck a sc, EC or CC? Obviously the lighter the better considering a 3200 stall speed with a procharger. Prochargers like high stall speeds.
D1 and 10.3-1, run good fuel and meth or e85. A procharger setup with L92 heads would do better with more exhaust duration on the cam but that should still work fine. That cam with your stall speed should be a decent match. Is your truck a sc, EC or CC? Obviously the lighter the better considering a 3200 stall speed with a procharger. Prochargers like high stall speeds.
#6
well its a tahoe... with some weight reduction. its moves good right now, so Im sure ill be more than pleased. Just the answer I was seeking. keep it 10.3 and run with the D1.
seems as if the D1 will be more reliable as well as less maintenance?
seems as if the D1 will be more reliable as well as less maintenance?
Trending Topics
#8
As Pat said, the L92 heads will like a decent amount more duration on the exhaust side with a supercharger. That cam also has a healthy amount of overlap at 5* which works OK in a D1, but I wouldnt go any bigger, and I think thats pushing it. With a 3200 converter in your heavy Tahoe it will feel strong, but you won't be cutting any 1.7x 60' that's for sure. I would even be surprised to see you dip below 1.90. In a perfect world I think a little less intake duration with a degree more LSA and it would work a lot better in your truck. Something like a 223/235 on a 114+4 would perform better IMO, and even thats big. I'm no cam guru, but I have spent a lot of time researching it.
That cam looks like something AndysC3 ran with his D1. It worked pretty well, but I know he was looking into a cam swap.
It may be better suited to a turbo build, but again its on the large side IMO. As an example look at Idahoblkss, he had the 80e with a converter around a 3000 with a MUCH smaller cam than you in his lighter sss with 4.10's and I don't think he ever got below a 1.80 60' time with his D1 and he was running almost 20# of boost!
That cam looks like something AndysC3 ran with his D1. It worked pretty well, but I know he was looking into a cam swap.
It may be better suited to a turbo build, but again its on the large side IMO. As an example look at Idahoblkss, he had the 80e with a converter around a 3000 with a MUCH smaller cam than you in his lighter sss with 4.10's and I don't think he ever got below a 1.80 60' time with his D1 and he was running almost 20# of boost!
Last edited by Vortec350ss; Dec 2, 2013 at 08:32 AM.
#9
Just FWI, My former personal truck in my sig had a 6l, 10.3 comp, and a S475 turbo running 14-15psi and making around 750hp to the wheel and wasn't done pulling.
And that was on pump 93 and meth.
And that was on pump 93 and meth.
#10
I notice Trick stage 3 kit is 700hp. Yours is about 50 more hp than that? Makes me interested.


