FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Whipple 2.9L compressor, 175AX

Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #91  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Default

All slashes in an url are like this "/" from now on.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #92  
Whippled 496's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
He needs 3 test ports in the intake: one on either side of the throttle to show if it is a restriction, and one by the filter to compare it and the one outside of the throttle, to show if that Whippletube along the firewall is as restrictive as I personally think it is.
Then another pressure sensor betwixt the blower and intercooler, to compare with the MAP reading, to see if the I/C is restrictive.
Well unfortunately nothing larger than that whipple tube is going to fit back there against the firewall. So i guess i am going to have to live with 6.5lbs of boost for now. I guess i could run it without the tube to see if thats it but it has an i.d. of 3.75"....so it should be okay. Thats the same size as the opening of the throttle body anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #93  
Whippled 496's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
All slashes in an url are like this "/" from now on.
You need to have something to do John. You never answered my PM by the way.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #94  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Default

Answered!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #95  
Whippled 496's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

I just wish there were another human being on this board with an 8.1L and Whipple like me.....to see if they were having better luck. Something is screwy and I cant figure it out. Intercooler loss would be relative to pressure input so i doubt thats it. Maybe i need to look closer at belt slip and crank pulley slip.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #96  
TrickTurbo's Avatar
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 62
From: Wichita Falls Tx.
Default

I was refering to see if the IC was the restriction. Measuring boost before and after shows just how bad or good the IC is in relation to air flow. IF the core is a huge restrition you can add more to one side and see little change on the other.
Whipple I am bettign rates the blowers with no IC in the line up.
just a thought,
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 05:02 PM
  #97  
Whippled 496's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

After some more testing...it looks like I AM seeing some belt slip. I picked up a .5" longer belt and slid my S/C idler as far to the right as i could to give maximum belt wrap. I am still only getting maybe 60% wrap at best, but its a little better than before. I am going to pick up a 100mm idler to replace the 76mm one that the Whipple came with. That should give me close to 75% wrap i hope.

Is there a way to figure what a 2.5" pulley "Should" be giving me as far as boost goes?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #98  
Whippled 496's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Whippled 496
Is there a way to figure what a 2.5" pulley "Should" be giving me as far as boost goes?
Nevermind, i went back and re-read James' explination. 22m^3 @ 10,300rpm input speed....i should be seeing 7psi without the intercooler. So i think at 13,500 input RPM i should be close to 8psi with the intercooler....if i am calculating correctly.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #99  
TieRod's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: KC MO
Default

I have something you might try. The Kodak/Topkick have an 1" bigger crank pulley. You could run bigger blower pulley to help reduce belt slip.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #100  
Whippled 496's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by TieRod
I have something you might try. The Kodak/Topkick have an 1" bigger crank pulley. You could run bigger blower pulley to help reduce belt slip.
Sweet! You got a part number handy? I will do some searching for that now.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.