To naturally aspirate or force induce
Oct 5, 2005 | 05:00 PM
#12
Staging Lane
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Formerly Hayden, AL . . . Now Attleboro Falls, MA
Looks like most people are voting SC. 
How does the milage on the 4.8L affect anyone's opinion on SC vs. NA? Nineball's truck is a 2000, and could therefore easily have 100k+ on the motor. (My '01 has 114k) Do you think FI with 100-125k on the odometer is still the way to go provided the engine is in good shape, i.e., compression's good on all cylinders?
How does the milage on the 4.8L affect anyone's opinion on SC vs. NA? Nineball's truck is a 2000, and could therefore easily have 100k+ on the motor. (My '01 has 114k) Do you think FI with 100-125k on the odometer is still the way to go provided the engine is in good shape, i.e., compression's good on all cylinders?
Oct 5, 2005 | 07:01 PM
#14
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by ecthelion
Looks like most people are voting SC.
How does the milage on the 4.8L affect anyone's opinion on SC vs. NA? Nineball's truck is a 2000, and could therefore easily have 100k+ on the motor. (My '01 has 114k) Do you think FI with 100-125k on the odometer is still the way to go provided the engine is in good shape, i.e., compression's good on all cylinders?
How does the milage on the 4.8L affect anyone's opinion on SC vs. NA? Nineball's truck is a 2000, and could therefore easily have 100k+ on the motor. (My '01 has 114k) Do you think FI with 100-125k on the odometer is still the way to go provided the engine is in good shape, i.e., compression's good on all cylinders?
Whether it matters or not, I do not know. However, my truck has 61,000miles. I appreciate all the comments thus far. I welcome all others as well.
Thanks,
Jake
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlowmasterMufflers
Ford Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
Nov 24, 2015 01:00 PM