FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More compression, less boost orrrrrrrrr less booost more comp??????

Old Jun 8, 2010 | 11:33 AM
  #11  
BigKID's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,952
Likes: 242
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

If this is your daily or mostly street driven truck, I would opt for the higher CR. I am currently running 11cc pistons with 241 heads for a 9.74 SCR with ~11psi. I had the shortblock built with the -11cc pistons with the intentions of lowering the CR with a head swap to add more boost in the future but my plans may change. I think I am going pully up to 15psi then I may actually increase the compression when I get a new set of heads depending on what I see at 15#.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 08:25 AM
  #12  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

If you want max power go the lower compression route. If you want better driveability, go with the higher compression route.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 08:34 AM
  #13  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

What he said ^

For highest output Boost > CR
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #14  
fastrt's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 1
From: Midlothian, Texas
Default

hell mill the heads a bit, and throw a thinner headgasket on it, bump it up to ~10:1 and then you can run it like that till you feel like you need more, and then go to a meth kit. higher comp works better for blowers anyway right?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 10:18 AM
  #15  
Foxxer's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, U.A.E.
Default

IMO low compression high boost.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #16  
dhpro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 1
From: SW CT
Default

Well...I'm running 9.3:1 CR and 10lbs of boost w/ meth. I can tell u first hand that the low compression is costing me a good chunk of ponies. I'm not so sure shaving my heads wud do the job either and I'd prob have to change pistons for diff dish/and change heads to get closer to 10:1 - which seems to be what everyone tells me is ideal...but frankly ITS FOR SALE so 550rwhp is where it'll stay - I cud be driving a nice Italian model for what I've spent on this thing!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #17  
Rick_Vor's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
If you want max power go the lower compression route. If you want better driveability, go with the higher compression route.
Originally Posted by trever1t
What he said ^

For highest output Boost > CR
3rd that. On a heavy vehicle, the high compression route will make it more driveable off boost. I'm assuming you are going to get a more Centrifugal friendly (wide LSA) cam once you rebuild so that may also kill some of your bottom end also so I see why you are leaning that way.

The LC version will ultimately make more overall power and with your PC pullied to hit say 17-18lbs, boost will come on a lot faster so the decrease in low end torque may be moot in a 2WD truck.

Originally Posted by Mangled03gmc
So maybe 9.7 or 9.8-1 and just run 15 psi instead of 18, keep the timing in check.. I hate his **** LOL. Like I said quench is important, makes for a happier, more responsive, less prone to detonate then with out good quench..
The quench will not be a factor when you are running a lot of boost. All that air being forced into the cylinder will be you all the swirl you need. Keeping the quench tight will help when your out of boost and cruising.

What is your piston height on your 370? I think I may be running the same pistons (Wiseco K444X05 -11) on my shortblock and my piston height with a stock crank, new GM 6.0l iron block and Lunati Pro Mod rods is .004 in the hole. With my AFR 225 72cc heads and a GM LS9 .053 head gasket, I'm hitting 8.94:1. I'd like it to be a little higher but milling the heads to 70cc only raises me up to 9.11, 68cc bumps it to 9.28. I'd rather keep the deck extra thick.

Rick

Last edited by Rick_Vor; Jun 11, 2010 at 08:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 08:23 PM
  #18  
SuperchargedSS's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
From: Ft.Lauderdale, FL
Default

how can anyone answer this question with that avatar you got going on? nice!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #19  
denali_on_26's's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
From: Where our street cars are faster than your racecars..Mississippi
Default

no clue really on what my CR will be but it is a 4" stroke with 4.030 bore and -20cc dish
and 72cc heads...

can someone tell me what i will be at...
i'm sure the 91mm will do fine i'm just curious...lol
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 09:00 PM
  #20  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by denali_on_26's
no clue really on what my CR will be but it is a 4" stroke with 4.030 bore and -20cc dish
and 72cc heads...

can someone tell me what i will be at...
i'm sure the 91mm will do fine i'm just curious...lol
Around 9.15 for 0.051" head gaskets
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.