magna or prochager for 6.2 denali
#41
guess my Magnacharged 7.0 liter does not exsist!
OH! BTFW it put's 600+ to the Wheels
#42
All I can say is what I saw renewed my faith in that company. Their kits are complete as can be and have excellent customer support.
600 to the wheels but I would guess if you hot lap it at the track 2 times she's out of breath.
I am a firm believer in centrifugal superchargers for the simple fact it's my job to design and regulate air systems. The roots blowers for high velocity high pressure systems died out in the early 70's because of lack of efficiency volume to compression ratio. It takes entirely too much volume to match the heat created by the close proximity the rotors need to pass to compress the air at a higher point. Beyond that it takes less potential energy to spin a centrifugal fan than it does a bind style roots compressor. There is a reason turbo's are so efficient and its not just the fact they create next to no paracidic loss. It has everything to do with the fact that they can compress the air on the cold side in a much more efficient chamber. One that allows more heat exchange.
When you come by tomorrow for the bbq I can dig out some numbers and prove my statements a little better to ya.
All I can say on this one is you can't argue with modern design.
Incidentally check the numbers in my sig.
5 psi made 500 hp on a 370. With a d1sc procharger with a weak tune that was running 10.9:1 afr's
Even Garth stfu after I put down the number on his dyno. with low boost.
See ya tomorrow
#44
All I can say is what I saw renewed my faith in that company. Their kits are complete as can be and have excellent customer support.
600 to the wheels but I would guess if you hot lap it at the track 2 times she's out of breath.
I am a firm believer in centrifugal superchargers for the simple fact it's my job to design and regulate air systems. The roots blowers for high velocity high pressure systems died out in the early 70's because of lack of efficiency volume to compression ratio. It takes entirely too much volume to match the heat created by the close proximity the rotors need to pass to compress the air at a higher point. Beyond that it takes less potential energy to spin a centrifugal fan than it does a bind style roots compressor. There is a reason turbo's are so efficient and its not just the fact they create next to no paracidic loss. It has everything to do with the fact that they can compress the air on the cold side in a much more efficient chamber. One that allows more heat exchange.
When you come by tomorrow for the bbq I can dig out some numbers and prove my statements a little better to ya.
All I can say on this one is you can't argue with modern design.
Incidentally check the numbers in my sig.
5 psi made 500 hp on a 370. With a d1sc procharger with a weak tune that was running 10.9:1 afr's
5 psi made 500 hp on a 370. With a d1sc procharger with a weak tune that was running 10.9:1 afr's
GOT TRACK TIMES?!
Even Garth stfu after I put down the number on his dyno. with low boost.
See ya tomorrow
See ya tomorrow
As for you?
Oh! It's on like donkey kong!
Last edited by supersub; Nov 8, 2008 at 03:14 AM.


