FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lost boost after intake and 80e swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 09:02 AM
  #11  
sharpshooter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

The valve is closed during boost.

The two things it could be or a combination of both. The new filter and new intercooler are a restriction. I bet it's the intercooler. Does the new fmic have the long horizontal "tubes" compared to the short procharger style?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 09:21 AM
  #12  
chevyboy.520's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 934
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by sharpshooter
The valve is closed during boost.

The two things it could be or a combination of both. The new filter and new intercooler are a restriction. I bet it's the intercooler. Does the new fmic have the long horizontal "tubes" compared to the short procharger style?
If the intercooler was a restriction, wouldn't he see more boost? If it flows better then it would see less boost.
If he ran piping from the Procharger to the throttle body, no intercooler he would see even less boost.
If the intercooler and new intake tube dropped you a few psi in boost then its flowing better. So pulley down, get back up to 12 psi and then you will feel a bigger increase in power.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 10:44 AM
  #13  
AndysC3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

It did feel just as fast. But my intake temps didn't go over 75 and it was about 50 outside and I was running 14* vs 8* of timing but afr was about 8. I've had the nnbs intake on for awhile. The intercooler is a 27x8x4" and flows strait through. I already put the 3.6" pulley on. I was running the 3.85" and I'm getting about 1.5 psi over what I was getting before. I'll do some more testing this weekend.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 10:48 AM
  #14  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Where is your boost guage referanced?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #15  
sharpshooter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by chevyboy.520
If the intercooler was a restriction, wouldn't he see more boost? If it flows better then it would see less boost.
If he ran piping from the Procharger to the throttle body, no intercooler he would see even less boost.
If the intercooler and new intake tube dropped you a few psi in boost then its flowing better. So pulley down, get back up to 12 psi and then you will feel a bigger increase in power.
If he reads boost before the intercooler then your right. If he reads boost at the intake manifold then I'm right.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 11:12 AM
  #16  
AndysC3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

I have a vacuum block attached to where the brake booster hose was. That's where the boost gauge is. I also read boost from the map sensor with efi live
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
chevrolet all the way's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 0
From: trussville alabama
Default

Good lord that is rich!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #18  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

So you are 2bar?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 11:24 AM
  #19  
AndysC3's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

Yes. I'm running a cos with a 2 bar sensor
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 11:25 AM
  #20  
sharpshooter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

The intake manifold is not seeing as much air(restriction prior to intake) causing lower boost and rich condition. If it was more efficient it would be leaner not richer.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.