FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Looking for missing power after 122HH upgrade...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 12:43 AM
  #41  
99ta's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
From: Gonzales, LA
Default

Originally Posted by 2005SSR6Speed
This is your Rotor Speed with different size Crank Pulley's. You will need to convert to an 8 Groove Pulley setup at some point due to pulley slip on the smaller Blower Pulley's with a 6 Rib Belt.

(Crank Pulley Size / Blower Pulley Size x Blower Drive Ratio) x Engine RPM

(8" Crank Pulley / 2.8" Blower Pulley x 1 Blower Drive Ratio) x 6500 Engine RPM's = 18,571 RPM's

(7.5" Crank Pulley / 2.8" Blower Pulley x 1 Blower Drive Ratio) x 6500 Engine RPM's = 17,411 RPM's

My setup is a little different because it is a Front Inlet and has a Rear Drive Ratio in the computation. The Inlet Forward has different Drive Ratios to choose from when building them. I am still below 21,000 RPM's Rotor Speed with my setup.

So how high should you go?
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #42  
leftcoast32's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 99ta
So how high should you go?
We can only physically spin them a little higher with smaller pulley's even on the Inlet Forward MP122HH Confguration.

I wouldnt worry about how fast you are spinning it in the Radix MP122HH Configuration. The Radix MP122HH can only be spun as high as 18,909 at 6,500 Engine RPM's with a 2.75 Blower Pulley and 8" Crank Pulley.

I think the biggest determining factor in a MagnaCharger build is the Cam Profile. I have access to several different profiles that are doing great with MagnaChargers!!

Last edited by leftcoast32; Jul 16, 2008 at 09:26 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #43  
GoatChs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 8
From: Far East Bay - Norcal
Default

I have decided to try two things to see what effect they will have on my new setup.

1) Change the cam from the LPE GT2-3 to a "blower-specific" grind.

2) Install an ASP Racing 8" 8-rib pulley conversion setup using the same 2.8-2.85" snout pulley diameter currently installed.

I will let everyone know what the results are as soon as each item is completed and retuned.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #44  
old motorhead's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 1
From: SE TEXAS
Default

Originally Posted by GoatChs
I have decided to try two things to see what effect they will have on my new setup.

1) Change the cam from the LPE GT2-3 to a "blower-specific" grind.

2) Install an ASP Racing 8" 8-rib pulley conversion setup using the same 2.8-2.85" snout pulley diameter currently installed.

I will let everyone know what the results are as soon as each item is completed and retuned.
I'm all ears. What cam are you considering? The cam in my sig has made about 100 more HP at only slightly more boost with a trick turbo. Are you sure your belt is slipping? Have you tried a belt "treatment"? It makes the belt tacky. Not a long term solution, but it would tell you if your belt wasn't doing its job. Other belt treatments involve a powder type stuff that helps the belt effectively have more surface area. Kind of makes a smooth belt have more grab.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #45  
GoatChs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 8
From: Far East Bay - Norcal
Default

Originally Posted by old motorhead
I'm all ears. What cam are you considering? The cam in my sig has made about 100 more HP at only slightly more boost with a trick turbo. Are you sure your belt is slipping? Have you tried a belt "treatment"? It makes the belt tacky. Not a long term solution, but it would tell you if your belt wasn't doing its job. Other belt treatments involve a powder type stuff that helps the belt effectively have more surface area. Kind of makes a smooth belt have more grab.
The cam that I'm switching to is a custom blower grind with 222/228 .566/.571 114LSA; valve events at .050:
Int = Open -2* BTDC / Close 44* ABDC
Exh = Open 49* BBDC / Close -1* ATDC

This provides 113* intake centerline and 115* exhaust centerline and -3* overlap. Definitely no bleeding off boost with this one.

As for belt slip, I'm not currently experiencing any slip with the oem crank pulley and a 2.85" SC snout pulley. However my intent has been to run 10-11 lbs boost. I was getting belt slip with my 112 running 11 lbs peak boost with a 2.8 pulley (evident by the powdered rubber on the alt bracket) so I figure the 8-rib is a safe investment in the event I get the itch to bump up the boost further.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #46  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GoatChs
The cam that I'm switching to is a custom blower grind with 222/228 .566/.571 114LSA; valve events at .050:
Int = Open -2* BTDC / Close 44* ABDC
Exh = Open 49* BBDC / Close -1* ATDC

This provides 113* intake centerline and 115* exhaust centerline and -3* overlap. Definitely no bleeding off boost with this one.

As for belt slip, I'm not currently experiencing any slip with the oem crank pulley and a 2.85" SC snout pulley. However my intent has been to run 10-11 lbs boost. I was getting belt slip with my 112 running 11 lbs peak boost with a 2.8 pulley (evident by the powdered rubber on the alt bracket) so I figure the 8-rib is a safe investment in the event I get the itch to bump up the boost further.
How about the numbers at the seat? .050 numbers dont always mean anything.

R
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #47  
GoatChs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 8
From: Far East Bay - Norcal
Default

Originally Posted by Rick@Synergy
How about the numbers at the seat? .050 numbers dont always mean anything. R
Sorry, I have not seen a "cam card" yet that shows numbers at .006 and never received a full spec sheet for any cam I've bought...including the 226/230 that I bought from you. I've contacted Comp Cams for a full spec sheet, but doubt that they will provide one...I'll likely have to get it Cam Pro'd to get those numbers. It does have Comp XE ramp profiles...if there is any standardization to those for calculating.

Any thoughts on the compression (11.5 SCR / 9.03 DCR) you asked about? Maybe swapping to my Absolute Speed 241 castings from the AFR 225s to raise compression?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #48  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Ca...obeCatalog.pdf

That might help with the specs...
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #49  
Hawk179's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GoatChs
Sorry, I have not seen a "cam card" yet that shows numbers at .006 and never received a full spec sheet for any cam I've bought...including the 226/230 that I bought from you. I've contacted Comp Cams for a full spec sheet, but doubt that they will provide one...I'll likely have to get it Cam Pro'd to get those numbers. It does have Comp XE ramp profiles...if there is any standardization to those for calculating.

Any thoughts on the compression (11.5 SCR / 9.03 DCR) you asked about? Maybe swapping to my Absolute Speed 241 castings from the AFR 225s to raise compression?

I was not saying that its anyones job to provide the numbers at the seat, I was only asking to figure out more about the cam. More is learned from seat timing and this is who I build all my cams, not by the .050. I know comps lobes very well and use them alot, so I pretty much know your cam now.

Also, the other things most of you should get to understand is that Every cam has overlap. To say it has no overlap is wrong. When defining overlap, you should say this one cam has a lot less overlap than my last cam. It helps everyone else to understand more.

The reason why compression is a little more important in a blower like yours is due to the fact that the more air needed to fill a chamber, the hotter it gets. Same with going to a bigger camshaft. The blower will get hotter because you are asking it to feed more now.

This is also where the three rules apply to boost. Power is made by boost, timing then compression last. In that order do you build a platform. The reason this is important is because it comes down to how much boost are you running. Then what kind of timing do you want to run, and from there you can decide on how much compression you need. The reason the timing is important because you need to match timing to the cam profile. You can put X cam in there, and be so far off on timing because it pings that you are no longer "on" the camshaft for making power. So now everything is wrong. So instead of just throwing parts at it, try sitting down and figuring out everything I guess said here.

R
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #50  
GoatChs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 8
From: Far East Bay - Norcal
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
Guess I don't have the math skills needed to determine the valve events from lift & duration? I'll research later to see if there are calculators online that can work from the info given.

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.