Kenne Bell 2.4L Kit...
Nov 29, 2007 | 08:39 PM
#31
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
There was an article in hot rod this month showing the 1900 TVS with dyno results only 11 hp more than the mp122. In fact they stated that above 5200rpm the MP122 had more power which was a bit of a surprise. I would like to see more data if anyone has dyno results.
Nov 29, 2007 | 08:57 PM
#32
TECH Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
There was an article in hot rod this month showing the 1900 TVS with dyno results only 11 hp more than the mp122. In fact they stated that above 5200rpm the MP122 had more power which was a bit of a surprise. I would like to see more data if anyone has dyno results.
Nov 30, 2007 | 07:16 AM
#33
TECH Resident
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities
Just saw this LOL.... At least it was a left handed bitch slap. Now PM me the price and we'll see if I'll call your bluff..
L76 six liter TVS
Dec 3, 2007 | 01:12 PM
#35
TECH Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
I think the 1900 is going to be too small for you. If you go with the TVS, go right for th 2300. As for the KB, the blower isn't bad, but only get one with an intercooler or it's not worth your time. As for the customer service, you'd get more out of talking to a wall than calling KB.
Dec 3, 2007 | 11:35 PM
#36
TECH Resident
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities
I'm going to wait for the TVS... Just don't know if I can hold out for the 2300. If it comes out at close to the same time as the 1900 I think I'll take your advice. Zipp did you ship my tranny parts yet PM me if you need my info again.
Just finished up the cam install tonight.. Idles nice and pulls strongly. I kept the VVT and it pulls like a diesel..
Oh, and no messages from BlownChev.. darn it.
PM me if you need my info again.Just finished up the cam install tonight.. Idles nice and pulls strongly. I kept the VVT and it pulls like a diesel..
Oh, and no messages from BlownChev.. darn it.
Dec 3, 2007 | 11:43 PM
#37
I'm going to wait for the TVS... Just don't know if I can hold out for the 2300. If it comes out at close to the same time as the 1900 I think I'll take your advice. Zipp did you ship my tranny parts yet PM me if you need my info again.
Just finished up the cam install tonight.. Idles nice and pulls strongly. I kept the VVT and it pulls like a diesel..
Oh, and no messages from BlownChev.. darn it.
PM me if you need my info again.Just finished up the cam install tonight.. Idles nice and pulls strongly. I kept the VVT and it pulls like a diesel..
Oh, and no messages from BlownChev.. darn it.
Dec 4, 2007 | 05:09 AM
#38
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:10 PM
#39
On The Tree
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: KCMO
would the 2.8 be too big for the 5.3 or would the 2.4 or 2.6 be a better bet? I also noticed the new kit on the site, it looks like it replaces the intake like the radix. Its called the "corvette kit". Its about the same as the radix cost wise too.
Last edited by Silverad04; Dec 13, 2007 at 12:18 PM.
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:25 PM
#40
The 2.8L would be overkill on a stock 5.3. I think a 2.4L would be great for a 5.3L under 10psi. If you have a 03+ the on-mainfold based truck kits have everything you need for a clean install. There are a few pieces that need to be fabed/mod'ed for the 99-02 as there are a few minor discrepencies.