KB vs MP122
#1
There is some interesting information in the LS1tech forum on the KB vs MP122.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...0&page=1&pp=20
enjoy!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...0&page=1&pp=20
enjoy!
#3
Is the Lysholm 2.3 that they're talking about the same as the TVS 2300 that we were talking about a couple weeks ago?
Very impressive numbers but it doesn't seem to be completely fair. The KB is pretty big at 2.8L compared to the 2.3L Lysholm, they're close but one is still bigger. It put up incredible numbers no doubt about that. But I would expect the bigger displacement to kick butt.
I am far from being an expert so forgive me if I'm not seeing everything as clearly as someone who has more experience with this.
Thank you for the GREAT information. Very helpful and informative.
Very impressive numbers but it doesn't seem to be completely fair. The KB is pretty big at 2.8L compared to the 2.3L Lysholm, they're close but one is still bigger. It put up incredible numbers no doubt about that. But I would expect the bigger displacement to kick butt.
I am far from being an expert so forgive me if I'm not seeing everything as clearly as someone who has more experience with this.
Thank you for the GREAT information. Very helpful and informative.
#4
Yes the KB is fairly big at 2.8 and I dont doubt that a 2.8 maggie would put down some damn good #'s however the they dont make one. To me the cool thing is that the 2.8 kit is capable of putting down 800+ on pump gas on a LS1 if not more, I guess more testing will show.
#5
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Originally Posted by yurs78
Is the Lysholm 2.3 that they're talking about the same as the TVS 2300 that we were talking about a couple weeks ago?
Very impressive numbers but it doesn't seem to be completely fair. The KB is pretty big at 2.8L compared to the 2.3L Lysholm, they're close but one is still bigger. It put up incredible numbers no doubt about that. But I would expect the bigger displacement to kick butt.
I am far from being an expert so forgive me if I'm not seeing everything as clearly as someone who has more experience with this.
Thank you for the GREAT information. Very helpful and informative.
Very impressive numbers but it doesn't seem to be completely fair. The KB is pretty big at 2.8L compared to the 2.3L Lysholm, they're close but one is still bigger. It put up incredible numbers no doubt about that. But I would expect the bigger displacement to kick butt.
I am far from being an expert so forgive me if I'm not seeing everything as clearly as someone who has more experience with this.
Thank you for the GREAT information. Very helpful and informative.
#7
KB's new 2.8H
Ideal boost range 15 psi to 24 psi
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...s/H_Series.htm
Ideal boost range 15 psi to 24 psi
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...s/H_Series.htm
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by 2004Denali
KB's new 2.8H
Ideal boost range 15 psi to 24 psi
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...s/H_Series.htm
Ideal boost range 15 psi to 24 psi
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...s/H_Series.htm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




