FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

KB vs MP122

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 08:55 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Default KB vs MP122

There is some interesting information in the LS1tech forum on the KB vs MP122.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...0&page=1&pp=20

enjoy!
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #2  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Nice!
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 11:51 AM
  #3  
yurs78's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Juda
Default

Is the Lysholm 2.3 that they're talking about the same as the TVS 2300 that we were talking about a couple weeks ago?
Very impressive numbers but it doesn't seem to be completely fair. The KB is pretty big at 2.8L compared to the 2.3L Lysholm, they're close but one is still bigger. It put up incredible numbers no doubt about that. But I would expect the bigger displacement to kick butt.
I am far from being an expert so forgive me if I'm not seeing everything as clearly as someone who has more experience with this.
Thank you for the GREAT information. Very helpful and informative.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #4  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

Yes the KB is fairly big at 2.8 and I dont doubt that a 2.8 maggie would put down some damn good #'s however the they dont make one. To me the cool thing is that the 2.8 kit is capable of putting down 800+ on pump gas on a LS1 if not more, I guess more testing will show.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default

Originally Posted by yurs78
Is the Lysholm 2.3 that they're talking about the same as the TVS 2300 that we were talking about a couple weeks ago?
Very impressive numbers but it doesn't seem to be completely fair. The KB is pretty big at 2.8L compared to the 2.3L Lysholm, they're close but one is still bigger. It put up incredible numbers no doubt about that. But I would expect the bigger displacement to kick butt.
I am far from being an expert so forgive me if I'm not seeing everything as clearly as someone who has more experience with this.
Thank you for the GREAT information. Very helpful and informative.
The Lysholm 2.3 they are talking about,is the same as the old style Whipple twin screw,the TVS is the newest modified rootes supercharger from Eaton[not part of their comparison]and the 2.8L is a larger version of the Lysholm twin screw supercharger.Basicly they compairing a 2.3L twin screw to a 2.8L twin screw supercharger.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
moschin0's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

aaaaaaaaaaa
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #7  
04Denali's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA
Default

KB's new 2.8H
Ideal boost range 15 psi to 24 psi
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...s/H_Series.htm
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 10:42 PM
  #8  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Denali
KB's new 2.8H
Ideal boost range 15 psi to 24 psi
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...s/H_Series.htm
Interesting read, thanks for posting that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluecobra
FORCED INDUCTION
10
Dec 17, 2014 09:32 PM
old motorhead
FORCED INDUCTION
14
Aug 1, 2010 11:28 PM
PSM
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Apr 17, 2009 11:06 PM
als777on
FORCED INDUCTION
14
Oct 20, 2008 11:54 PM
BOLLAS
FORCED INDUCTION
18
Oct 20, 2008 07:09 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.