FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

KB front mount limits......

Old Oct 1, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #21  
bansheerider44's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Bandera, TX
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
You're running 19psi of boost, but what is your exhaust back pressure? That has more to do with why the hot parts failed. If you have a tiny exhaust housing on there with a restrictive exhuast post turbo (dp, tailpipe, muffler etc), it will cause a ton of backpressure. I'm wondering if you need more of a flex joint in there to allow for the amount of heat you're throwing at it. The way it broke looks like it was loaded and not from internal pressure. Its hard to say though from the pic.
no back pressure behind turbo. 4 inch turbo back, no mufflre and only one small bend. Im not a turbo expert, Nelson Performance has been helping me with all the details. He is the one that turned me on to Kyle.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #22  
7845's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 781
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
You're running 19psi of boost, but what is your exhaust back pressure? That has more to do with why the hot parts failed. If you have a tiny exhaust housing on there with a restrictive exhuast post turbo (dp, tailpipe, muffler etc), it will cause a ton of backpressure. I'm wondering if you need more of a flex joint in there to allow for the amount of heat you're throwing at it. The way it broke looks like it was loaded and not from internal pressure. Its hard to say though from the pic.
i was thinking the same thing. i think his truck only making 6xx with that amount of boost something is wrong. i dont say PSI is the issue but rather the small turbo on the 6.0 being choked up with back pressure
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #23  
7845's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 781
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by bansheerider44
no back pressure behind turbo. 4 inch turbo back, no mufflre and only one small bend. Im not a turbo expert, Nelson Performance has been helping me with all the details. He is the one that turned me on to Kyle.
you can still have backpressure bud...what AR is that turbo and what size again?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #24  
bansheerider44's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Bandera, TX
Default

Originally Posted by kbracing96
He did contact me before he posted and I offered to build him a new stainless crossover for only the cost of materials. The only down side is that the crossover needs to be fitted to the manifold that it was built for so the V-band will line up. Every kit is a little bit different and fit on a V-band is important for sealing.

My speculation on what happened, is at 19 lbs of boost on this type of setup is probable some where in the neighborhood of 3 to1 back pressure meaning there is some where around 60psi in that pipe and generates a TON of heat very quickly. The area where is failed is especially a hot spot coming right off the manifolds and probable turns bight red in a hurry. That's just more stress then the steel can handle I would have to guess.

I'm running the EXACT same crossover on my truck for over a year not and have ran up to 15 psi and it's still hold fine.
I appreciate the offer, but if im going to have to fit it up anyway I figured I would go ahead and just build it all. I say 19 psi is max, running around 90 percent of the time the controller is off and on 15 psi. But again, I had no idea that I couldnt run high boost with it. Thanks again
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #25  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

It's less psi on the dyno, 19psi on the street. For some reason, we just couldn't load the dyno enough to get full boost, so HP is more than 612hp, that's just what we recorded. I think it was somewhere around 12psi at peak rpm and max of 16psi midrange.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #26  
bansheerider44's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Bandera, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 7845
you can still have backpressure bud...what AR is that turbo and what size again?
here are the turbo specs, I have the gtk850 on there now, and have a new gtk1000 thats going on when it goes back together. again, this is my first turbo project, i never claimed it was a perfect kit. and the 612 hp was at 16 psi, and i have 22s that weigh over 100 lbs each. they rob alot of power.

http://www.racetep.com/tnetgtk.html
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 11:10 AM
  #27  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by bansheerider44
I appreciate the offer, but if im going to have to fit it up anyway I figured I would go ahead and just build it all. I say 19 psi is max, running around 90 percent of the time the controller is off and on 15 psi. But again, I had no idea that I couldnt run high boost with it. Thanks again
I'll do what ever it takes to make this right. I want everyone to know, I stand behind my kit 100%!

Edit: Mic is pushing these a lot harder them most will ever do, and when you push things to the limit, you find the weakest links. All I can do it to build it stronger and see what fails next. That's the name of the game in High HP applications.

Last edited by kbracing96; Oct 1, 2008 at 11:20 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #28  
7845's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 781
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by bansheerider44
here are the turbo specs, I have the gtk850 on there now, and have a new gtk1000 thats going on when it goes back together. again, this is my first turbo project, i never claimed it was a perfect kit. and the 612 hp was at 16 psi, and i have 22s that weigh over 100 lbs each. they rob alot of power.

http://www.racetep.com/tnetgtk.html
eww..thats a small turbo on that healty 6litre. id say with a .81 ar your seeing high back pressure levels even with your exhaust. I again dont htink its PSI as much as its back pressure. again the damage is over but dont point blame at KBkit when psi isnt the issue. its more of back pressure...also waht size wastegate?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #29  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

Seriously, we have no idea as to the limits of this kit, because the only thing that was measured was boost. HP numbers weren't even measured either. I'm willing to bet he has a small A/R housing stuffed on there in an effort to build as much boost on the street as possible with a manual trans.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #30  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

Originally Posted by 7845
eww.. again the damage is over but dont point blame at KBkit when psi isnt the issue. its more of back pressure...also waht size wastegate?
It could also possibly be a material quality, binding situation, or improper heat during welding.
Where it cracked indicates the possibility of any three.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.