Intercooler came off results.
#21
Originally Posted by James B.
Find a 1200HP rated intercooler and some elbows on EBay and build your own intercooler setup. That's what I did and it works amazing. IAT gets to no more than 25 degress over ambient IAT no matter where the throttle is and that with hot-air intake. I also have a very large surface are heat exchanger up front. Better to go large area and thin than small area and thick when shedding the most heat is desired.


This is the intercooler radiator on the right side:



This is the intercooler radiator on the right side:

#22
Originally Posted by hemifever
You go richer because your air isn't as dense now. So basically you're getting less air, same fuel.
Don't forget your cam that you added. Remember I talked to you about overlap and superchargers? You can be losing boost based off the cam overlap (and other characteristics) and with a supercharger it's just lost. With a turbo, the turbo adds more boost automatically causing it to work harder and have a little more EGT. I was figuring you'd pick up boost from the i/c removal, and lose some based on the cam, and you'd be even.
Don't forget your cam that you added. Remember I talked to you about overlap and superchargers? You can be losing boost based off the cam overlap (and other characteristics) and with a supercharger it's just lost. With a turbo, the turbo adds more boost automatically causing it to work harder and have a little more EGT. I was figuring you'd pick up boost from the i/c removal, and lose some based on the cam, and you'd be even.
#23
Originally Posted by ColtSteele
Just curious if they did anything else to it besides the intercooler. So when's th enext track date Jerry?
#25
Originally Posted by hemidup
3rd gear is still fat. Just ran the 1/8 mi Superchips data acquistion program that put me at a 7.37@91mph. Tomorrow night will be real time numbers.
#26
Jimmy, The Mustang intercooler that came with the GSM kit was nothing more than a huge restriction. I put a new belt on and the boost came back at 12 psi. EGT's are still happy. I maxed out your 55lb injector setup again and we're now tuning with two 48lb auxilary injector backup's.
#28
Originally Posted by whitt1
How much fuel pressure are you running and is your fuel pressure boost referenced?I think that raising your fuel pressure would be more easily controlled than adding 2 extra injectors.
#29
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
When you say you are maxing the 55lb injectors,does that mean you are running them at a 100percent duty cycle,that would mean you are making 935 fwhp.55lb injectors @58psi should be good for 748 fwhp at a 80 percent duty cycle and 795 fwhp at a 85 percent duty cycle.That's assuming a boost referenced reguator,if it is not boost referenced you will loose about 10 psi or an amount equal to the boost you are making.With a non boost referenced reguator the supercharger would only see 48psi of fuel pressure and max the injectors at about 850 fwhp or 680 rwhp. How much power are you making?
Last edited by whitt1; May 26, 2007 at 01:03 PM.
#30
We can't increase duty cycle to the injectors directly so we increase MAP voltage to get more fuel but we are limited to 5V so we don't max(100%) out the duty cycle. We probably are only pushing the injectors to a 80% idc. He is definately making 650+rwhp right now with his setup.
One of these days there will be HemiEdit then we will be able to tune these Hemi's right.
BTW, I get a max of 675 crank hp with a BSFC of .55, 58psi, & 80% idc. The injectors are 612cc at 58 psi(4 bar).
One of these days there will be HemiEdit then we will be able to tune these Hemi's right.
BTW, I get a max of 675 crank hp with a BSFC of .55, 58psi, & 80% idc. The injectors are 612cc at 58 psi(4 bar).


