FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ebay Roush TVS1900 installed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 01:28 AM
  #141  
quez82's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Default

Weird, I suprisingly hook alright. Just hooks n goes. Messed up my neck already lol not use to it.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 03:32 AM
  #142  
jiar577's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by quez82
Thanks guys. I'm actually on 373 right now and bout to swap too 4.10s . I can't bwlieve the difference, just floats now. I'll work on those graphs.
Aren't blowers supposed to work better with higher gears, like 3.42? I think that's what I've read here, 4.10 + blower = no traction
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #143  
CalSpeedPerformance's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

If you guys were looking for the details on quez82's truck:

We got the install done real quickly, no real problems that we couldn't take care of. Used original MAP sensor etc.

Truck is a 07 Extended cab 2wd on 22"? wheels, 3.73 gears, 224/224 @ 114 camshaft, Longtubes/y-pipe. no previous dyno #'s.

Also:

On eddy current loaded (5250lbs) Mustang 1100SE Chassis Dyno:
Truck made approx 480 rwhp @ (Flat from 6200-6500 rpm). Great power curve. Timing is on the conservative side. Airfuel 11.5-11.8 across the board. 91 octane.

All the dyno pulls were made in 2nd gear due to the tall tires with 3.73 gear. Then made a 3rd gear pull for the last pull. (I really dont like to run 2-piece driveshaft pickups up to 150+ mph with tall tires etc). Pulls were made one after another with no cool down time. A couple hour cool down would see an easy 500 rwhp

Keep in mind this is on a mustang dyno, dynojet #'s would be higher but id never trade the eddy current setup for a standard dynojet for tuning


Duckhunter1999: Its your tune settings causing the high map code. You need to have the pcm tune changed for it and it wont come on anymore. It popped up just the same on quez82's truck and I fixed it.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #144  
duckhunter1999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Pratt, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by CalSpeedPerformance
If you guys were looking for the details on quez82's truck:

We got the install done real quickly, no real problems that we couldn't take care of. Used original MAP sensor etc.

Truck is a 07 Extended cab 2wd on 22"? wheels, 3.73 gears, 224/224 @ 114 camshaft, Longtubes/y-pipe. no previous dyno #'s.

Also:

On eddy current loaded (5250lbs) Mustang 1100SE Chassis Dyno:
Truck made approx 480 rwhp @ (Flat from 6200-6500 rpm). Great power curve. Timing is on the conservative side. Airfuel 11.5-11.8 across the board. 91 octane.

All the dyno pulls were made in 2nd gear due to the tall tires with 3.73 gear. Then made a 3rd gear pull for the last pull. (I really dont like to run 2-piece driveshaft pickups up to 150+ mph with tall tires etc). Pulls were made one after another with no cool down time. A couple hour cool down would see an easy 500 rwhp

Keep in mind this is on a mustang dyno, dynojet #'s would be higher but id never trade the eddy current setup for a standard dynojet for tuning


Duckhunter1999: Its your tune settings causing the high map code. You need to have the pcm tune changed for it and it wont come on anymore. It popped up just the same on quez82's truck and I fixed it.
Calspeed,
If you don't mind what exactly did you change so I can let Justin know? Thanks for your help.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #145  
CalSpeedPerformance's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default

diagnostic setting for high MAP, any tuner should know what to change so it wont pickup the code again after getting the code.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #146  
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 5
From: Houston, Texas
Default

And I believe the MAP sensor needs a 5v power supply, not a 12v. Just throwing this out there if that could be your problem.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #147  
smokeshow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by TX Tahoe Z71
And I believe the MAP sensor needs a 5v power supply, not a 12v. Just throwing this out there if that could be your problem.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #148  
duckhunter1999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Pratt, Kansas
Default

Thanks for all your help guys.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #149  
duckhunter1999's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Pratt, Kansas
Default

On the 5v power supply how do I know if it's 5 or 12, the map sensor is hooked up the same as it was from the factory.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #150  
SuperchargedSS's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
From: Ft.Lauderdale, FL
Default

Originally Posted by jiar577
Aren't blowers supposed to work better with higher gears, like 3.42? I think that's what I've read here, 4.10 + blower = no traction
my TVS1900 and 4.10s with true trac would hook decent. Stomping on the gas from a dead stop would allow you to spin for awhile, but most of my stomping was during a slow roll. A set of drag radials would cure that problem, but the TVS is long gone...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.