Eaton.. Ported vs. Non ***SPLIT FROM OTHER THREAD***
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
This thread will be the place to talk about a "ported" Eaton supercharger vs a stock Eaton supercharger.
Original thread a question was asked "why would you remove the coating off of the rotors?"
Original thread a question was asked "why would you remove the coating off of the rotors?"
Last edited by BlownChevy; Apr 4, 2006 at 11:10 AM. Reason: Thread moved.
#3
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by mickey03L
steig offers rotor stripping. they tend to advise on it cause sooner or later the teflon will start to flake off. also gives lil more clearance i reckon
#5
Originally Posted by joebob450r
Moregrip: here are a couple of before pics.


was there any other blending or porting involved?
#6
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by NVR_SPDS
It doesnt seem to effect our trucks though. When ported we get 2psi more, and lower intake air temps.
Takeing the coating off will make the blower less efficient at the higher RPM range....
#7
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Takeing the coating off will make the blower less efficient at the higher RPM range....
Rotor stripping
Bird
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by Bird
One of the premier blower porters in the country, Bob Stiegemeier, actually performed tests on his blowers to determine that fact and found out that it truly didn't affect the efficiency at all..................
Rotor stripping
Bird
Rotor stripping
Bird
Mr. B,
I wish I still had access to the information that would prove that wrong.....I worked for EATON/Magnuson for the better part of two years. I have spent countless hours in test rooms proving the exact opposite of what is being claimed in that/this thread. The one thing I can tell you is that the Gen 4 rotors (Lightning) were coated and tested against an un coated rotor group....each time the coated rotors surpassed the un coated in efficiency. Removing the coating from the rotors is the equivalent of the Teflon strips going away on an old roots two lobe rotor. The GEN 5 rotors are actually coated with an APC (abrade able powder coating)...the reason behind this was in testing the GEN 4 (lightning) blowers it was proven that the EGR "filled" the imperfections in the rotors increasing the efficiency even more over time.....Sorry to say that the information that Stiegemeier is providing you is wrong.....
"Rotor Flake" is not the leading cause of blower damage....I have not seen ONE EATON supercharger come in due to failure by "ROTOR FLAKE". But I guess being the only AUTHORIZED EATON supercharger manufacture in North America does not get us any kudos. Sorry guys, this IS the facts not BS. Pretty is not always functional.
Last edited by BlownChevy; Mar 18, 2006 at 07:23 PM.
#10
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Originally Posted by joebob450r
That's a good point, BlownChevy. But I didn't do it to be pretty. I did it because I would rather have the teflon off now, and lose a little efficiency, then have it clog up my I/C.
That I would agree with







