FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dynoed my Whipple Denali again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 03:31 PM
  #1  
Bromaguire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default Dynoed my Whipple Denali again

I had my truck dyno tested on a dynojet instead of the mustang dyno I did it on last time and had some good results. I made 412rwhp and 464 lbstq this time on the dynojet. Last time on the mustang dyno I only made 365rwhp and 381 lbs.tq. No changes at all were made. I am still running it at 7psi. Its intercooled, with jba headers and corsa exhaust. I should have my new pulley this week and I am hoping to get around 10-12psi with it. These numbers were on my 24" wheels. Any guesses on how much more power I will get out of my setup with more boost?

Last edited by Bromaguire; Oct 3, 2009 at 06:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #2  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Hmmm...those are some good numbers with a stock 6L is it?
If those numbers are accurate I would assume you'll see mid to low 5xx's
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #3  
Bromaguire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Hmmm...those are some good numbers with a stock 6L is it?
If those numbers are accurate I would assume you'll see mid to low 5xx's
Yep stock internals. Only the blower, headers, exhaust and a custom CAI.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
Silver-Dollar's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Default

I have always heard Mustang dyno number are always lower because of loading. But a difference of 50 is huge.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #5  
Bromaguire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Silver-Dollar
I have always heard Mustang dyno number are always lower because of loading. But a difference of 50 is huge.
I was surprised but I have no complaints. These numbers were also on my 24" wheels.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 12:05 AM
  #6  
icedenali's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

it could of been number of things, first mustang dyno most likely have lower numbers. also whipple tend to loose some power on hot or hot weather. it could of been weather diff + diff dyno.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 02:54 AM
  #7  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Why did you dyno again if you didnt change anything?

Doing what you did is like weighing yourself on a different scale because you didnt like what the first one said; it may give you a different number, but its doesnt change what you have.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 03:06 AM
  #8  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Because knowledge is power
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #9  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

yea but he already knew....unless he just wants to play the dyno game, dynos should be used as a relative measurement, the track is for the overall power...

but hey, id love to have a blown denali
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #10  
broke1's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: corrupt shit hole that is Alabama
Default

Is this one of the side mount Whipples?

If so,id say you have to be close to maxing it out.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.