Dragalanche-new times!
Dec 9, 2006 | 07:24 PM
#11
Originally Posted by Allgonoshow
wow, that's alot of timing
what is that a factor of, temps?
i get 18 with my radix and your pcm,my radix blows 9psi at wot with stock 3.4 pulley not dyno tuned
what is that a factor of, temps?
i get 18 with my radix and your pcm,my radix blows 9psi at wot with stock 3.4 pulley not dyno tuned
Dec 10, 2006 | 07:51 PM
#15
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Originally Posted by bud8fan
and new injectors and slicks as well 
what was the 60' allen 
what was the 60' allen This weekend I'm heading back to the track to run a 12.8!
I know the big truck has it in it.
More timing, leaner a/f ratio ( it's at 10.5 at wot now) I'm sure it'll run it.
thanks guys,
allen
Dec 10, 2006 | 07:52 PM
#16
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Originally Posted by 2lugnuts
Okay is it just me or did anyone elso see this:
New time: 13.01 @ 105 !!!
Just a reminder that's 5980lbs for the lead sled.
So Allen when will you start adding the Parachutes to this beast?
New time: 13.01 @ 105 !!!
Just a reminder that's 5980lbs for the lead sled.
So Allen when will you start adding the Parachutes to this beast?
later,
allen
Dec 10, 2006 | 08:02 PM
#17
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 1
From: From Houma La. Living n Ellisville Miss.
Originally Posted by FarmTruc
Hi Guys,
I ran my best this Friday down in Edinburg.
Just to recap, here's a list of my mods:
2005 Av, 5.3L
STS turbo, still at 5psi
212cam
2600 yank converter
shiftkit
fuel upgrades
snowperformance kit
We drove a long way to run just once, it started raining after the first run, so that sucked. I just put in new injectors and had no time to fine tune it, BUT I did get my slicks on and they sure did help!!
New time: 13.01 @ 105 !!!
Just a reminder that's 5980lbs for the lead sled.
I was still at 26degs of timing, not 28 like last time, so that would have helped, it was my first run with the slicks, so that was a "test" run. I feel it has a 12.7 or 12.8 as is. It's running very damn strong for 5psi on the street.
So my next goal is to run 12.5 in the 1/4, still with 5psi. I'm upgrading to a posi, 3.73 gears (has 3.42 now)
and lighter tires in the front.
Then, we'll see about going to 10psi.
later, and thanks for listening,
allen
I ran my best this Friday down in Edinburg.
Just to recap, here's a list of my mods:
2005 Av, 5.3L
STS turbo, still at 5psi
212cam
2600 yank converter
shiftkit
fuel upgrades
snowperformance kit
We drove a long way to run just once, it started raining after the first run, so that sucked. I just put in new injectors and had no time to fine tune it, BUT I did get my slicks on and they sure did help!!
New time: 13.01 @ 105 !!!
Just a reminder that's 5980lbs for the lead sled.
I was still at 26degs of timing, not 28 like last time, so that would have helped, it was my first run with the slicks, so that was a "test" run. I feel it has a 12.7 or 12.8 as is. It's running very damn strong for 5psi on the street.
So my next goal is to run 12.5 in the 1/4, still with 5psi. I'm upgrading to a posi, 3.73 gears (has 3.42 now)
and lighter tires in the front.
Then, we'll see about going to 10psi.
later, and thanks for listening,
allen
just a ? you are going to 3.73 it would not be to much with 10 lbs of boost
Dec 11, 2006 | 08:00 AM
#18
105mph @ 5950lbs puts you at about 650fwhp. That's a damn efficient 5.3L at only 5psi. I think the power comes from your crazy timing. Are you running an IC with meth or just meth? How much meth?
Do that to a 4500lb truck and it'd go easy 11's.
Do that to a 4500lb truck and it'd go easy 11's.
Dec 11, 2006 | 08:37 AM
#19
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
The truck launches good with 3.42's, but it's just a tad heavy, so I'm thinking the 3.73's will have a lower 60', which will bring the 1/4 mile time down. Plus, the Av doesn't have short tires, so it'll even out.
We'll see if 10psi will be too much! I have a lot customers running it.
I'm sure the turbo will still load just fine being that the truck is so heavy and the converter is pretty loose.
I've never dynoed it, so I'm not sure what the HP is. I wouldn't think it would be at 650fwhp, sounds high. If I get some time I'll dyno it.
It's definitely only at 5psi, still the stock setup from STS.
I'm running the STS tubing, but with an intercooler I spec'd out and had made. The same one running with the new front mount turbo.
Yes, I'm using the snowperformance.net kit it works very well! I just got my second nozzle and I'll install it by this weekend to keep things cool.
It'll run 30degs of timing, but I just haven't run it down the track with that much, yet.
video coming soon,
thanks,
allen
We'll see if 10psi will be too much! I have a lot customers running it.
I'm sure the turbo will still load just fine being that the truck is so heavy and the converter is pretty loose.
I've never dynoed it, so I'm not sure what the HP is. I wouldn't think it would be at 650fwhp, sounds high. If I get some time I'll dyno it.
It's definitely only at 5psi, still the stock setup from STS.
I'm running the STS tubing, but with an intercooler I spec'd out and had made. The same one running with the new front mount turbo.
Yes, I'm using the snowperformance.net kit it works very well! I just got my second nozzle and I'll install it by this weekend to keep things cool.
It'll run 30degs of timing, but I just haven't run it down the track with that much, yet.
video coming soon,
thanks,
allen
Dec 11, 2006 | 09:45 AM
#20
Originally Posted by slowec
Can you tell us more about the 212 cam or make a suggestion for my setup. I am lurking around tryin to build my knowledge of what works on a sts cam wise. Thanks, sorry to hijack and great times out of that huge heavy beast!BTW, you do know those butturbos are dyno no-load queens that'll never work at the track 
