FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cam for sts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #11  
deadpool0907's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

what would be recommended for a STS kit on a TBSS with a 3600 stall?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #12  
WJ MARK's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: colorado above 6000 ft.
Default

im running an 02+ LS6 cam and gained 50 hp. with the turbo. Pulls alot harder above 4k
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #13  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nightrunner
i thought most used that in a radix'd app.
Had one in mine when I was running the STS.....seemed to like it alot.....
However it likes the TVS more
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #14  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

On a 6.0 I personally wouldn't go too big with a cam. Something in the teens for duration. Bigger is not necessarily better. I'm happier with my 220/222 in my 408 than I was with a 235/239.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #15  
SRT10KLLR's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

The guy that built my 408 put in a 224/231 .595 on 114 LSA. It has a 8.7 cr and will be using a STS with a GTS 76.

What is a reverse split?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 07:28 PM
  #16  
Mort's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Default

224/231 = forward split ( favors exhaust flow over intake)

231/224 = reverse split ( favors intake flow over exhaust)
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #17  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

Cam selection goes around the setup. 6.0 with STS is definitely not enough info.

Things that have to be known is ,rest of the exhaust,cats,stall converter,gears and tires used ect.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: Newark, Tx.
Default

Don, he doesnt even have this set up anymore. Thread just got brought back up.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 11:30 PM
  #19  
SRT10KLLR's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by trtturbo
Don, he doesnt even have this set up anymore. Thread just got brought back up.
Didn't even notice that but that's ok I still learned something.

Originally Posted by Mort
224/231 = forward split ( favors exhaust flow over intake)

231/224 = reverse split ( favors intake flow over exhaust)
Don't turbo's need more exhaust flow to spool?

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Cam selection goes around the setup. 6.0 with STS is definitely not enough info.

Things that have to be known is ,rest of the exhaust,cats,stall converter,gears and tires used ect.
Here is my setup:

408 w/8.7 cr
p&p 6.0 heads
stock truck intake
STS Turbo w/GTS 76
224/231 .595 on 114 LSA
3.73 gears
MT 28/11.5/16 tires
2800 stall
stock exhaust because of STS
will be removing cats
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #20  
Mort's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Default

I am no cam expert, but with a turbo being the largest restriction in most turbo exhaust systems the benefits of a forward split are lost. A forward split uses the longer exhaust valve duration to scavenge the cylinder and draw in the initial intake charge. With a turbo back pressure is created in the exhaust which in turn will keep the initial intake charge from entering the cylinder. Just the opposite of scavenging the cylinder. Therefore the idea is to get the exhaust valve closed at just the correct time to prevent any back pressure in the cylinder while allowing all the spent combustion gases to be vented from the cylinder. The scavenging is not as important with the turbo because the intake air is under pressure. A supercharger on the other hand, can have a more open and efficient exhaust system and may benefit from the longer exhaust valve duration to ensure all the old combustion gases are removed and to aid in the initial intake charge filling the cylinder.
Spooling of the turbo is probably more effected by the initial rush of exhaust out of the cylinder than by a little longer but much smaller push at the end of the exhaust stroke. Maybe a cam with a higher exhaust lift and a faster ramp rate will have a larger effect on spooling the turbo faster but these things will also increase wear and tear on the valve train and a shorter life span and higher maintenance will be the cost.

Last edited by Mort; Jan 28, 2008 at 10:13 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeff.ellis
FORCED INDUCTION
6
Aug 18, 2015 10:34 PM
ZO6Ted
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion
9
Aug 12, 2015 07:50 PM
lawhitediamante
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
5
Aug 12, 2015 12:14 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
Deceptarado
New Members
0
Jul 8, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.