FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

BoostJuice Recipe $1.50 gal.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #41  
MGMC's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

now someone just needs to try it
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #42  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Lightbulb Just another idea

Originally Posted by Rick_Vor

I had to take Cheminstry twice because I sucked at it but as long as your not suffering from distrbution problems with the Meth, I would imagine the larger droplets would absorb more energy (heat) to break their bond and become a gas so it would lower AIT's better. Along the same lines as why liquid in your radiator cools better than steam. This also myay be totally wrong but I'm on a roll. :-)

Rick
Rick, I believe the science behind the smaller droplets has it's positives. Take a look at it like this, say with a 10# nozzle you have X droplets per second and their total combined surface area of there "sphere like shape" is Xsa. Then you go to two 5# nozzles and you get 2Y droplets per second and their total combined surface area is 2Ysa. I am pretty sure that up unto a point where the droplet size actually becomes TOO SMALL, you will see an increase in efficiency of evaporation rate. Basically 2Y droplets > X droplets, and 2Ysa > Xsa. There is more surface area available for the hot air charge to evaporate, thus bringing temps down more so than the larger droplets.
If I am wrong, please educate me.

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #43  
MikeGyver's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,520
Likes: 244
From: Suburban Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Rick_Vor
... I would imagine the larger droplets would absorb more energy (heat) to break their bond and become a gas...
That is absolutely correct, but you didn't factor time:
Originally Posted by ForcedTQ
Rick, I believe the science behind the smaller droplets has it's positives. Take a look at it like this, say with a 10# nozzle you have X droplets per second and their total combined surface area of there "sphere like shape" is Xsa. Then you go to two 5# nozzles and you get 2Y droplets per second and their total combined surface area is 2Ysa. I am pretty sure that up unto a point where the droplet size actually becomes TOO SMALL, you will see an increase in efficiency of evaporation rate. Basically 2Y droplets > X droplets, and 2Ysa > Xsa. There is more surface area available for the hot air charge to evaporate, thus bringing temps down more so than the larger droplets.
If I am wrong, please educate me.

Chris
You are absolutely correct, because you did factor time. To simplify for those of us that aren't that new guy, crisp, you want droplets as large as they can be that will completely evaporate in the air before they hit some surface as a liquid. That way all of the heat of evaporation will come from the air, and not the engine parts.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #44  
Rick_Vor's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
That is absolutely correct, but you didn't factor time:
You are absolutely correct, because you did factor time. To simplify for those of us that aren't that new guy, crisp, you want droplets as large as they can be that will completely evaporate in the air before they hit some surface as a liquid. That way all of the heat of evaporation will come from the air, and not the engine parts.

Sweet. It's like our two little minds make one giant brain...

Alsways nice to learn something new. Thanks for clearing it up MikeGyver.

Rick
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #45  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
I have three nozzles on my set up
A bit much, don't you think?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 07:38 PM
  #46  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

just spray the meth straght....................like the big boys do
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 11:06 PM
  #47  
TurboBerserker's Avatar
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Wilde Racing
A bit much, don't you think?
Hell no.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2010 | 12:07 AM
  #48  
LsxCody's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 1
From: Virginia!!!!
Default

Originally Posted by kbracing96
Check out Yellowbullet.com 's FI section. Some REAL turbo racers in there, lol. The guy I talked to a little says it cools at the source of the heat, where it does the most good and helps the turbo make a better seal for compressing the air making for a more efficient compressor.
it is some serious racers on that site lol
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #49  
danbap's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: se wi.
Default

i mix 1 gallon of -20 washer fluid with 2 bottles of yellow heet. picked up a bunch on clearance.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tgui
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
2
Aug 22, 2015 12:08 PM
dewmanshu
BBQ, FOOD, RECIPES, DRINKS, & PARAPHERNALIA
4
Jul 8, 2011 07:28 PM
jpodell
BBQ, FOOD, RECIPES, DRINKS, & PARAPHERNALIA
2
Jun 17, 2011 11:16 PM
regency
Southern
9
Aug 7, 2008 05:56 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.