FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Boosted 5.3-6.0 ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 05:57 AM
  #11  
bud8fan's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,453
Likes: 0
From: calallen,tx
Default

Isn't that order backwards?
went from a sts to a radix to a front mount...all completely diffrent animals.


Only downside I see is mileage. See my above comment. I need more evidence. A friend said his 6L swilled gas too.[/QUOTE]
i had the front mount put on the 4.8 along with a new flt5 and yank2600 and was getting 20 mpg on the hiway and then swapped the 4.8 for a 6.0 and still got 19.5 mpg hiway. swapped out the 60e for the 80e and now get 14-16 on the hiway
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #12  
TURBHOE's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

i get 14-16 as it is. so it seems it may be the 80e in the hd's killing mileage not the displacement.?.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #13  
WJ MARK's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: colorado above 6000 ft.
Default

I don't care about the milage that much, just power difference between the 2
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #14  
sureshot's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by WJ MARK
I don't care about the milage that much, just power difference between the 2
I know my buddy, sharpshooter, used to run a consistent 14.1 in the quarter on his old setup: 5.3 with procharger. When the 5.3 blew we replaced it with an LQ4 and cam, the only thing we did was put the cam in, and he recently ran a 12.8 and consistently runs high 12's-low 13's now. Keep in mind this is on an ecsb with a 6" lift and 33" tires!
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #15  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

I opted to go with the 5.7L in the crew cab . It added the same SOTP gains as the 6.0 did in my last RCSB. The other added feature of the 5.7L is better fuel mileage, I was still able to get 17-18 MPG hwy/street.

Just my .02
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #16  
fastnblu's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by bud8fan
Isn't that order backwards?
went from a sts to a radix to a front mount...all completely diffrent animals.
i had the front mount put on the 4.8 along with a new flt5 and yank2600 and was getting 20 mpg on the hiway and then swapped the 4.8 for a 6.0 and still got 19.5 mpg hiway. swapped out the 60e for the 80e and now get 14-16 on the hiway[/QUOTE]

Ya, but you went from largest cubes 1st to smallest, in that order, correct? You've got to experience something most can't. 3 different power adders. Most might not ever get to try 1. Gives u a perspective most wouldn't have.

That sounds like a 80e kills mileage. How can that be? A 60e has a 3.06 1st whereas a 80e has a 2.48. Did u change to a wild convertor when u put in 80e?

Originally Posted by 4.8T
i get 14-16 as it is. so it seems it may be the 80e in the hd's killing mileage not the displacement.?.
Unless u guys are puttin in 80's, & since u know they're bulletproof, are beatin on them alot harder whereas knowing the weakness(es) of the 60e. Maybe you were takin easier on the 60e. Myself, I just pound on the 60e & hope it holds.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #17  
Raffman's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Power is addictive......You get accustomed fast and want more.
So don't do anything to the 5.3 pass and go directly to FI 6.0 +
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #18  
sharpshooter's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by sureshot
I know my buddy, sharpshooter, used to run a consistent 14.1 in the quarter on his old setup: 5.3 with procharger. When the 5.3 blew we replaced it with an LQ4 and cam, the only thing we did was put the cam in, and he recently ran a 12.8 and consistently runs high 12's-low 13's now. Keep in mind this is on an ecsb with a 6" lift and 33" tires!
couldn't have said it better
feels like a different truck
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #19  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Default

Need 6L80E conversion swap now!!!
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #20  
fastnblu's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
Default

Sounds good to me. How much $?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.