FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

adding boost at over 100k miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:18 PM
  #1  
02SilveradoLT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: ND
Default adding boost at over 100k miles

just kinda been throwing around the idea as my truck is almost paid off.. not like im gonna go out and buy a kit in a week or two though its just a thought. maybe a mp112 or an sts setup. more or less wondering what everyones thoughts are on adding boost to a motor with over 100k on the ticker..
Thanks 02
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #2  
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 5
From: Houston, Texas
Default

I got 104k on the clock and threw an mp112 on there less than a year ago and she runs like a top. Get it tuned right and don't cut any corners and these engines will last past 200k... the transmission on the other hand might need some help by then.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
02SilveradoLT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: ND
Default

right i surf this forum like all the time and found out pretty much right away the tranny can barely handle stock power.. you like or love your mp112?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #4  
LsxCody's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 1
From: Virginia!!!!
Default

you shouldnt have a problem,i wouldnt do it if you had lets say 175000 but right around 100 i dont see a problem
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:49 PM
  #5  
black00chev's Avatar
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Default

You will be ok just make sure everything is in tip-top shape before you do it
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 07:06 PM
  #6  
02SilveradoLT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: ND
Default

well im actually at 118k, but i would say my truck runs great.. from what ive read i would say the mp112 would be great for me as i dont know how to tune.. whereas turbo requires more work into the tuning portion.. i know ive probably seen it on here before but i cant remmember, what kind of power can a person expect out of a mp112 on a stock 5.3?
thanks 02
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 08:47 PM
  #7  
02SilveradoLT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: ND
Default

i know im jumping the gun an nobody has replied to my last post yet.. however i love the sound of the sts its just intense!! but living in ND i hunt and fish alot and i think one should be a little worried having a turbo under there rig while offroad.. anyone have any exp with this?
thanks 02
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #8  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by LsxCody
you shouldnt have a problem,i wouldnt do it if you had lets say 175000 but right around 100 i dont see a problem
first thing I ever turboed, a 91 S10 with 2.8 v6, 180,000 on the clock. 6psi of NON-intercooled boost. Ran GREAT! drove it for 10k miles before I sold it to my brother.


Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 09:12 PM
  #9  
01midmetws6's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

I am putting a turbo on my 00 x-cab with 155k in the next month or so. Cross your fingers for me
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #10  
viciousknid's Avatar
Where's the Beef?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 1
From: Dover, Oklahoma
Default

why cross our fingers? Get the AFR and timing dialed in on the tune and get a good transmission behind it and your solid.
I have 150k on mine and wouldn't hesitate to boost it. I have plans to upgrade to a Crew Cab next year or so but I may end up with some spray on it eventually.... who knows.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.