FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

681rwhp stock long block, vid inside

Old Apr 3, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: ODESSA, TX
Default

Do you have the full specs on the turbo?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 08:09 AM
  #52  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

I'd like to see pictures of the down pipe as well...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 08:11 AM
  #53  
QWK-293's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by silveradol33
When Blowchevy can show me a BONE STOCK 5.3 with an 80e and 456 gears with heavy 35s and heavy 20s that puts down that much power over and over with a TVS , let me know.
Is a TVS a heat pump? I read using the search function that Blownchevy said to do and it came up how the TVS was a hot air device. Also read in the search that a TVS on a 434 only made 950 crank
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #54  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

I guess you guys really know your stuff! I assume that GM needs engineers like the ones at Baker so they can save money. There certainly was no need to develop the LS9 or LSA if a stock LM7 can hold the power. My bad folks, I guess I stand corrected.

As for the 950 crank on a 434, yes the 2.3L is about maxed out at 950-1000 BHP. I really do not think that is much to be ashamed of, do you? There is always going to be a bigger turbo, bigger blower, bigger this, bigger that. I truly wish you all would see it for what it is, a VERY well engineered piece of work that will satisfy 99.99% of the masses.


Congrats on your HUGE HP numbers on your stock motor. Personally I think it is NOT responsible to report that this can be done on a stock motor, there are people out there that will chase that dream and either go broke doing it or hurt themselves.

Last edited by BlownChevy; Apr 3, 2009 at 09:40 AM. Reason: Typo
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #55  
Bill Reid's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
I guess you guys really know your stuff! I assume that GM needs engineers like the ones at Baker so they can save money. There certainly was no need to develop the LS9 or LSA if a stock LM7 can hold the power. My bad folks, I guess I stand corrected.

As for the 950 crank on a 434, yes the 2.3L is about maxed out at 950-1000 BHP. I really do not think that is much to be ashamed of, do you? There is always going to be a bigger turbo, bigger blower, bigger this, bigger that. I truly wish you all would see it for what it is, a VERY well engineered piece of work that will satisfy 99.99% of the masses.


Congrats on your HUGE HP numbers on your stock motor. Personally I think it is NOT responsible to report that this can be done on a stock motor, there are people out there that will chase that dream and either go broke doing it or hurt themselves.
Well said my friend. I think its great that folks learn how to really push stock motor's... I mean really push them. It's amazing those cast pistons don't vaporize I agree there should be some sort of warning though... don't try this at home kids

Great numbers, congrats... and yes, I too would like to see the downpipe.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #56  
WJ MARK's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: colorado above 6000 ft.
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
I guess you guys really know your stuff! I assume that GM needs engineers like the ones at Baker so they can save money. There certainly was no need to develop the LS9 or LSA if a stock LM7 can hold the power. My bad folks, I guess I stand corrected.

As for the 950 crank on a 434, yes the 2.3L is about maxed out at 950-1000 BHP. I really do not think that is much to be ashamed of, do you? There is always going to be a bigger turbo, bigger blower, bigger this, bigger that. I truly wish you all would see it for what it is, a VERY well engineered piece of work that will satisfy 99.99% of the masses.


Congrats on your HUGE HP numbers on your stock motor. Personally I think it is NOT responsible to report that this can be done on a stock motor, there are people out there that will chase that dream and either go broke doing it or hurt themselves.

I agree as well, Im sorry but I myself can't make that kind of power with my truck on my own. Maybe if I had a tuner with me to get it there but I am highly skeptical of the longevity of that motor making that kind of power.

Enjoy that sucker while it lasts!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #57  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

I never said anything bad about the 2300. I just would not recommend it to make 1000hp is all. It is a very nice piece indeed and I am sure that is why GM uses it.

I use them in builds up to 600whp and they are great with never a trouble one. Other then the occasional broken tensioner or water pump pulley. I personally have not pushed a 2300 so I will be waiting to see for my self is all.

As far as me being a so called idiot by Blownchevy for making big power on stock engines???? (Maybe just a big miss understanding too lol, could be going at it for no reason and will laugh about it later?) Three years and waiting for a 900+hp LQ9 to break! It came from a 93,000 mile Escalade that was burnt to the ground. I have done it with many 4.8's 5.3l's and 6l's with no trouble. The pistons are not weak either, only when you rattle them. With good fuel this is not an issue. The weakest link with a proper tune is the RODS!

The engine, turbo system, and fuel system will last for seasons like this. The trans, rear diff, front diff, drive shafts will come and go first.

If you are going to talk about reliability of the stock engine you might as well leave them bone stock.

Will it still be dumb when his forged engine is done and he makes 1000+whp with a 83???? That is what the system is built for anyhow. Turbo is the same chassis.

Last edited by hellbents10; Apr 3, 2009 at 02:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 02:02 PM
  #58  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

Yep, plenty of room to grow with that frame
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 02:10 PM
  #59  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

Yeah, yours should really make the hp with the 75. What hot side so you have. Steve's is a 83mm turbine wheel with a 1.1 a/r t-6 housing. Do you have a 83, 87, or 96mm turbine wheel? You should be good for another 12-14lbs/min or total air flow over the 68.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #60  
QWK-293's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WJ MARK
I agree as well, Im sorry but I myself can't make that kind of power with my truck on my own. Maybe if I had a tuner with me to get it there but I am highly skeptical of the longevity of that motor making that kind of power.

Enjoy that sucker while it lasts!
Since im new to this can you answer me this? what is the major difference in longevity of a forged motor or stock motor if the tune is correct?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.