FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which crank?
346 ci
8
33.33%
391 ci
16
66.67%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

346 or 392 with radix Poll!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 08:11 PM
  #1  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default 346 or 393 with radix Poll!

What I am for sure going to run:
6.0L heads mildly ported
stock 6.098 rods with ARP bolts
2.75 pulley on the radix
3.905 bore, ok maybe 4.000 but we will see.

Unsure about either a stock 3.62 crank or a 4.100.
Basically 346ci or 393ci
About 12lbs boost or about 8lbs boost ~ give or take.

I think the more cubes with less boost will make more power anyways but will cost $800 more.

Last edited by mjhoward; Dec 14, 2005 at 10:33 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by mjhoward
What I am for sure going to run:
6.0L heads mildly ported
stock 6.098 rods with ARP bolts
2.75 pulley on the radix
3.905 bore, ok maybe 4.000 but we will see.

Unsure about either a stock 3.62 crank or a 4.100.
Basically 346ci or 391ci
About 12lbs boost or about 8lbs boost ~ give or take.

I think the more cubes with less boost will make more power anyways but will cost $800 more.
go with the 391. OR get a 408 like i'm doing.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #3  
NoChrome's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Edwards AFB CA
Default

No replacement for displacement.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #4  
1SlowHoe's Avatar
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,962
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

less boost on more cubes=less heat=more power. I vote 391.
I guess you could look at it like this:

8 cylinders @ 12 pounds (each cylinder being 43.25)

or

9 cylinders @ 8 pounds (each cylinder being 43.44)

Last edited by 1SlowHoe; Dec 14, 2005 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #5  
Yellowsierra's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

I say the bigger motor. For one you will be putting less strain on the motor and making the same or more power plus if you lator on decided to get say a turbo or turbos you would have a good motor with a lot of torque. If you put the 4.100" stroke crank with the radix your going to have some awesome torque off the line
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Default

Are you going with an aluminum or a CI block?I don't think I would try to bore the 4.8 block to 3.905 and add a stroker crank.If you are going with a different block a LS2 block or a 6.0CI block with the 4.10 stroke would give like 412 CID or more depening on overbore.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 10:12 PM
  #7  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by whitt1
Are you going with an aluminum or a CI block?I don't think I would try to bore the 4.8 block to 3.905 and add a stroker crank.If you are going with a different block a LS2 block or a 6.0CI block with the 4.10 stroke would give like 412 CID or more depening on overbore.
It will be a 4.8/5.3 block. I feel that it will bore just fine to 3.905 if not to 4.000. The couple of blocks I have measured have at the very least I could find a .260 wall thickness. Boring from 3.780 to 4.000 would take off .110 per side which would leave .150 wall. I have seen engines run on as little as .060 wall. There are always variables and for that reason I am considering the 3.905 bore just to be conservative since this is not a *****-to-the-wall motor. The other reason for the 3.905 bore is the better choice of off the shelf pistons which would cost less and could get it back together more quickly. Thanks for your input. I'm leaning torwards the 4.100 crank myself.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

I would say go with the 391ci. It would be nice bc it is would be the only one out there (that I know of). But how much can that Radix flow?? You just want to make sure that it doesnt besome restrictive.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 10:35 PM
  #9  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Just rechecked my math and it would actually be a 393 ci w/ 4.100 stroke and 3.905 bore. The 4.100 will require a custom piston, the 4.000 stroke would not.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #10  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Go for cubes man knowing you will not be happy unless you have the big motor
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.