View Poll Results: Which crank?
346 ci



8
33.33%
391 ci



16
66.67%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll
346 or 392 with radix Poll!
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
What I am for sure going to run:
6.0L heads mildly ported
stock 6.098 rods with ARP bolts
2.75 pulley on the radix
3.905 bore, ok maybe 4.000 but we will see.
Unsure about either a stock 3.62 crank or a 4.100.
Basically 346ci or 393ci
About 12lbs boost or about 8lbs boost ~ give or take.
I think the more cubes with less boost will make more power anyways but will cost $800 more.
6.0L heads mildly ported
stock 6.098 rods with ARP bolts
2.75 pulley on the radix
3.905 bore, ok maybe 4.000 but we will see.
Unsure about either a stock 3.62 crank or a 4.100.
Basically 346ci or 393ci
About 12lbs boost or about 8lbs boost ~ give or take.
I think the more cubes with less boost will make more power anyways but will cost $800 more.
Last edited by mjhoward; Dec 14, 2005 at 10:33 PM.
#2
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by mjhoward
What I am for sure going to run:
6.0L heads mildly ported
stock 6.098 rods with ARP bolts
2.75 pulley on the radix
3.905 bore, ok maybe 4.000 but we will see.
Unsure about either a stock 3.62 crank or a 4.100.
Basically 346ci or 391ci
About 12lbs boost or about 8lbs boost ~ give or take.
I think the more cubes with less boost will make more power anyways but will cost $800 more.
6.0L heads mildly ported
stock 6.098 rods with ARP bolts
2.75 pulley on the radix
3.905 bore, ok maybe 4.000 but we will see.
Unsure about either a stock 3.62 crank or a 4.100.
Basically 346ci or 391ci
About 12lbs boost or about 8lbs boost ~ give or take.
I think the more cubes with less boost will make more power anyways but will cost $800 more.
#4
less boost on more cubes=less heat=more power. I vote 391.
I guess you could look at it like this:
8 cylinders @ 12 pounds (each cylinder being 43.25)
or
9 cylinders @ 8 pounds (each cylinder being 43.44)
I guess you could look at it like this:
8 cylinders @ 12 pounds (each cylinder being 43.25)
or
9 cylinders @ 8 pounds (each cylinder being 43.44)
Last edited by 1SlowHoe; Dec 14, 2005 at 08:33 PM.
#5
I say the bigger motor. For one you will be putting less strain on the motor and making the same or more power plus if you lator on decided to get say a turbo or turbos
you would have a good motor with a lot of torque. If you put the 4.100" stroke crank with the radix your going to have some awesome torque off the line
you would have a good motor with a lot of torque. If you put the 4.100" stroke crank with the radix your going to have some awesome torque off the line
#6
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Are you going with an aluminum or a CI block?I don't think I would try to bore the 4.8 block to 3.905 and add a stroker crank.If you are going with a different block a LS2 block or a 6.0CI block with the 4.10 stroke would give like 412 CID or more depening on overbore.
#7
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Originally Posted by whitt1
Are you going with an aluminum or a CI block?I don't think I would try to bore the 4.8 block to 3.905 and add a stroker crank.If you are going with a different block a LS2 block or a 6.0CI block with the 4.10 stroke would give like 412 CID or more depening on overbore.
Trending Topics
#8
I would say go with the 391ci. It would be nice bc it is would be the only one out there (that I know of). But how much can that Radix flow?? You just want to make sure that it doesnt besome restrictive.


