FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
View Poll Results: Which crank?
346 ci
8
33.33%
391 ci
16
66.67%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

346 or 392 with radix Poll!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2005, 01:25 AM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
 
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CHarris
I'd stick with the 346 with the Radix. Lots of boost and gets the best use of that supercharger. But if you think you might want to go bigger later.... theres no replacement for displacement


A great combo for a heavy truck would be a iron block 346 with forged internals and the Radix....you could run some serious boost (safely) and the end result would be great linear power all through the powerband.
Old 12-17-2005, 02:31 AM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love having options. Just a few years ago I would have been buying 2 new pistons and throwing it back together. I am feeling more strongly about the 346 than any of the combos.
Old 12-17-2005, 06:12 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
JimS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You'd be staying with the Radix that way?... and avoiding the cost of the turbo also?
Old 12-17-2005, 06:49 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I'll be keeping the radix.
Old 12-17-2005, 07:15 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
 
JimS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjhoward
Yeah, I'll be keeping the radix.
It doesn't sound as exciting as the 392 w/turbo but it sure makes great sense given that you already have a hot car to play with and given that this possible combo still makes a dammed strong and fun truck at an affordable price. Personally I pat you on the back for having the sense/discipline to settle for the less exciting toy when it makes sense to do so. I have a hard time with that. I'm still a spoiled brat who tends to have a tantrum when I can't have what I want when I want it
Old 12-17-2005, 08:24 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimS
It doesn't sound as exciting as the 392 w/turbo but it sure makes great sense given that you already have a hot car to play with and given that this possible combo still makes a dammed strong and fun truck at an affordable price. Personally I pat you on the back for having the sense/discipline to settle for the less exciting toy when it makes sense to do so. I have a hard time with that. I'm still a spoiled brat who tends to have a tantrum when I can't have what I want when I want it
I appreciate the compliment. I always go way overboard as well. I just have to keep telling myself that it is just the tow truck and has to get me 70 miles round trip to work every day.
I basically saw that I was about to build a motor like I want in the vette. I then stopped and tried to figure out how I was going to top the truck motor in the vette and that answered it for me. Invest the speed parts in the toy made for speed.
It's still going to have 50-75 more hp than the 4.8 due to the cubes and better heads (ported 817's).
Old 12-17-2005, 08:55 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
 
JimS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know what 817's are???
Old 12-17-2005, 09:36 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
GoatChs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far East Bay - Norcal
Posts: 520
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Naked AV


A great combo for a heavy truck would be a iron block 346 with forged internals and the Radix....you could run some serious boost (safely) and the end result would be great linear power all through the powerband.
I gotta agree here...mostly because this is the route I took for my Yukon. I bought a 02 LS1 with 12k miles (you could find a 5.3 for poring to 3.905 for alot cheaper than my 5.7L), had it rebuilt with Ross -15cc forged & a set of lightly worked 317 6.0L heads. ARP main & head studs, ARP rod bolts, nitrided crank and LPE GT2-3 cam. I'm running a Radix with a 2.85 pulley at 9.5# boost, and have 425rwtq at 2200 rpm that holds til 4200 thru 3.42 gears on a Mustang dyno. My major issue with getting good hp numbers is high IATs, even with the bigger HE. IATs hit 197* in 57* ambient. Not sure how to hit 12# without meth injection. My next step is taller gears...likely 3.90s. But you can expect excellent hp & tq with a 346...don't know how much more would be gained with the 408.

Last edited by GoatChs; 12-17-2005 at 09:55 PM.
Old 12-19-2005, 08:33 AM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

317's are 6.0L heads.

I'd like more cubes, even though it would sacrifice boost, but I'm trying to get the most bang for my buck on the concervative side with what resources I have. I think the 346 will be plenty. A hell of a lot better than that damn 293!
Old 12-19-2005, 06:44 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
JimS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I figured you meant 317 but thought maybe there was another part known as a 817 (your post shows 817).


Quick Reply: 346 or 392 with radix Poll!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.